Back
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Venkataramana Swamy Vidyavardhaka Sangha – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The captioned writ petition is filed seeking following reliefs:
b) Quash the endorsement dtd. 25/1/2018 bearing No.ED 2010 SOH 2016 passed by the 1st Respondent vide Annexure-N.
c) Pass any order of consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity."
2. The petitioner-Society claims that it is running several educational institutions which are declared to be Linguistic Minority Institution. The petitioner-Society claims that the members of the Society are of Konkani speaking population. Therefore, Society claims that it has been declared to be the minority institution vide Government letter dated 15/16/2/1994. The grievance of the Society before this Court is that respondent No.1 vide impugned endorsement dtd. 25/1/2018 as per Annexure-N placing reliance on the Notification dtd. 18/6/2014 issued by respondent No.1 has withdrawn the declaration granted in favour of the Society on the ground that the petitioner-Society does not
The court affirmed that minority educational institutions must maintain a significant representation of students from the minority community to retain their status, and the state has the authority to....
Minority educational institutions can be established without prior permission, but the State may require a minimum percentage of admissions from the minority community to maintain their status.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State cannot impose a limit on the admission of students from the minority community to an unaided minority professional institution, as e....
Minority institutions have the constitutional right to appoint principals without state interference, recognizing their entitlement under Article 30 of the Constitution.
The right of minority educational institutions to administer admissions under Article 30(1) is subject to reasonable regulations by the State to maintain educational standards.
The fixation of government seat quotas in unaided minority institutions is unconstitutional and violates their fundamental right to autonomy under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
Linguistic Minority Institutions are entitled to administer appointments autonomously under Article 30 of the Constitution, and the designation must be upheld in light of administrative integrity and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
