Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR
T.Sivakumar – Appellant
Versus
C.Somasundaram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against dismissal of claim petition under o.21 r.58 cpc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT :
K. Murali Shankar, J.
The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.2 of 2019 dated 06.11.2019 on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkotai, confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in E.A.No.96 of 2010 in E.P.No.102 of 2009 in O.S.No.153 of 2008 dated 29.08.2016 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai.
2. The appellant is a third party petitioner and he filed a claim petition under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking orders for setting aside the order attaching the property bearing House Plot No.1366, Town Survey No.8525 at Kamban Nagar, Rajagopalapuram, Pudukkottai.
3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as per their status / ranking in the Executing Court.
4. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
(a) The petitioner is the absolute owner, in possession of the house property bearing House Plot No.1366 at Kamban Nagar, Rajagopalapuram, Pudukkottai District having purchased for a valid sale consideration to the tune of Rs.29 lakhs vide sale
Collusive transfer to defeat creditor voidable under execution proceedings despite preceding attachment if lacking bona fides.
The Court emphasized the importance of verifying the ownership of the property before making an attachment before judgment and upheld the rights of a third party purchaser under Order 38 Rule 10 of C....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a claim petition filed under Order XXI Rule 58 of CPC shall be adjudicated upon as if it is a regular suit, and any adjudication on the rights....
A transfer made with knowledge of an attachment before judgment can be contested as fraudulent under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Private transfer after attachment void under Section 64 CPC against decree holder's claims; claimant must prove bona fide purchase via precise encumbrance verification.
The main legal point established is that property conveyed to a Defendant's wife can be attached to satisfy a decree if the conveyance was done to evade execution, and legal heirs are liable to satis....
Debt can be defined as an obligation to pay an ascertained sum of money, and therefore, a claim for compensation does not come within that purview.
The court established that non-compliance with procedural requirements for attachment before judgment renders the attachment ineffective, impacting the validity of subsequent sales, including court a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
