SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3221

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
P. Muthu – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Kaja Kamaludeen – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:M. Saravanan, Advocate. For the Respondent:M. Parameswari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order passed in O.S.No.982 of 2012 dated 11.02.2020 on the file learned I Additional District Munsif Court, Trichy, expunging the portion of oral evidence of P.W.1 -A.K.Abdul Kareem, and allow the present civil revision petition.)

1. The revision petition is filed against the order passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif Court, Trichy in O.S.No.982 of 2012 dated 11.02.2020.

2. According to the revision petitioner, the order of the trial Court expunging the portion of oral evidence of P.W.1 is illegal. The revision petitioner would further submit that the petitioner has only stated that his grandfather was inducted as a tenant by one Kajamain Rawthar and he was a tenant under Kaja Kamaludeen. However, the trial Court has erroneously held that the petitioner has admitted that he was in dural relation ship and erroneously held that the petitioner is a tenant under Kaja Kamaludeen and therefore, he cannot put questions about non-joinder of the legal heirs of Kajamain Rowther is fatal. He would further submit that the specific stand taken by the petitioner is t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top