IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.S. SUNDAR, SUNDER MOHAN, JJ.
Barakathullah & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union of India rep.by the Inspector of Police, National Investigation Agency, Chennai - Respondent
CRLA.Nos. 98, 114 & 116of 2023 & CRL.MP.Nos. 11595 & 8094 of 2023
Decided On : 19-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and criminal appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts pertaining to the organization's alleged activities (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. accused's arguments against their arrests and allegations (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. prosecution's narrative and materials collected (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. defense strategies based on absence of evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. witness testimonies and their implications (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. legal arguments regarding fir procedures (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. evidence's relevance to allegations of terrorism (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. constitutional balance between rights and law enforcement (Para 23 , 24 , 27) |
| 10. statutory interpretation of provisions under uapa (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. court's rationale regarding bail considerations (Para 32 , 33) |
| 12. final considerations leading to conclusion about bail (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 13. court's interpretation of prima facie evidence under uapa. (Para 38) |
| 14. conclusion and grant of bail to appellants (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 21[4] of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008,`against the impugned order passed by the learned Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, [Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai] in bail application in Crl.MP.No.742/2022 in RC.No.42/2022/NIA/DLI dated 03.01.2023 pending on the file of the respondent. Criminal Appeal filed under Section 21[4] of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008,`to set aside the order passed in Crl.MP.No.722/2022 dated 03.01.2023 on the file of the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast Cases, Chennai at Poonamallee, Chennai and grant bail to the appellants in Rc.No.42/2022/NIA/DLI pending on the file of the respondent.)
COMMON JUDGMENT
S.S. SUNDAR, J.
(1) All the above three Criminal Appeals are connected and arising out of the proceedings in relation to RC.No.42/2022/NIA/DLI involving common issues and hence, the Appeals are taken up together for hearing and are disposed of by this common judgment.
(2) Totally, there are 13 named accused and other unknown accused in RC.No.42/2022/NIA/DLI.
(3) Crl.A.No.98/2023 is filed by the appellant who is arrayed as A7 out of 13 named accused, against the order passed by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, which is also the Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast Cases, Chennai at Poonamallee, dated 03.01.2023 in Crl.MP.No.742/2022 in RC.No.42/2022/NIA/DLI, dismissing the bail application filed for bail under Section 43 7 read with 439 of Cr.P.C. and 43[D] of the Unlawful Activities [Prevention] Act, 1967 [hereinafter referred to as UAPA ]. Crl.A.Nos.114 and 16/2023 are preferred by A1, A3, A4 [Crl.A.No.114/2023], A5, A6, A8 and A9 [Crl.A.No.116/2023] against the order passed in Crl.MP.No.722/2022 dismissing the bail applications filed by them under Section 43 7 read with 439 of Cr.P.C. and 43[D] of UAPA .
(4) Brief facts that are leading to the above three appeals are as follows:-
(5) It appears that the Central Government has received information that the office bearers, members and cadres of an Organization known as ‘’Popular Front of India [hereinafter referred to as PFI] having its registered office at New Delhi and its Unit office all over India, along with others are conspiring and collecting funds within India and abroad for committing terrorist act in various parts of India including States of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh etc. The First Information Report was registered in RC.No.14/2022 on 13.04.2022. The complaint was registered against 21 named individuals and other unknown persons by the National Investigation Agency [hereinafter referred to as NIA] before the Police Station, NIA, New Delhi, for offences under Sections 120B and 153A of IPC and under Sections 17 , 18, 18B, 20, 22B, 38 and 39 of UAPA . Following that, another
AI
(1) Bail application – Question of grant of bail concern both liberty of individuals undergoing criminal prosecution as well as interest of criminal justice system in ensuring that those who commit c....
(1) Grant of bail – Question of discarding material or document at stage of considering bail application of accused on the ground of being not reliable or inadmissible in evidence, is not permissible....
Under Section 43D(5) of the UA(P) Act, bail is to be denied where prima facie evidence substantiates serious accusations of terrorism, while less compelling evidence may warrant bail.
Prolonged detention without trial violates constitutional rights, necessitating bail when evidence of participation in unlawful activities is insufficient.
Bail cannot be granted for offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 unless Court comes to conclusion that there is no prima facie case against accused.
Prolonged pre-trial detention without trial completion justifies bail, emphasizing constitutional rights over statutory restrictions.
The court emphasized that constitutional rights to liberty prevail when trials are unduly prolonged, allowing bail despite serious terrorism charges.
Prolonged pre-trial detention without trial may necessitate bail, especially when trial completion is unlikely, balancing the severity of allegations with the accused's rights under Article 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.