Back
G. JAYACHANDRAN
Narashimman – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch C. I. D. , Vellore Range, Crime No. 656 of 1991 – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in Crl.A.No.491 of 2021: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the conviction and sentence rendered in Spl.Case No.3 of 2006 on the file of the learned Special Judge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai District and acquit the accused from the offence.
Crl.A.No.508 of 2021: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., to call for records and to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai made in Special Case No.3 of 2006 dated 15.09.2021.)
Common Judgment:
The genesis of these appeals stems from the complaint of Mr.Lawrence Alexander, Joint Director of Agriculture Department, Thiruvannamalai, to the Superintendent of Police, alleging that during the course of audit of the accounts in the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture (Oil Seeds), Cheyyar, misappropriation of the Government money to a tune of Rs.64,96,291/- by forging the contingent bills presented to the Sub Treasury, Cheyyar, between 1985 to 1990 noticed.
2. During that p
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused's failure to diligently scrutinize bills and records facilitated misappropriation, leading to their conviction for conspiracy and ....
Public servants misappropriating funds and failing to remit them can be convicted under the PC Act and IPC. The absence of documentation does not exempt accountability for the misappropriation.
Public servants found guilty of misappropriating funds by fabricating documents in a criminal conspiracy, invoking sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC.
The judgment establishes the difficulty in proving conspiracy and the importance of inferring conspiracy from surrounding circumstances. It also emphasizes the severe consequences of corruption and t....
Once entrustment is established, if the accused fails to provide a satisfactory explanation, it can be presumed that he committed the offense of criminal breach of trust and misappropriation.
Public servants convicted of misappropriation and forgery through forged loan applications must be proven to have made false documents and abused their positions, affirming the importance of direct e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
