SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 232

ANITA SUMANTH
Dr. Subashini R – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:For the Petitioners:Suhrith Parthasarathy, Advocate. For the Respondents: M.R. Gokulakrishnan, Additional Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioner's two-year compulsory bond period as completed, and to consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 10 to relieve the petitioners from the bonded service and to direct the 11th Respondent to return the Petitioner's original certificates and documents collected by the 11th Respondent while admitting the petitioners to the post graduate degree course along with their post Graduate degree certificate.)

1. Mr.M.R.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents and is armed with instructions to enable final disposal of the matter, even at this juncture. Hence, by consent of both learned counsel, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal, even at the stage of admission.

2. I have considered an identical prayer as in the present Writ Petition in W.P.No.28238 of 2023 and have held as follows:

"The petitioner is a Doctor, who had completed Post Graduation in Gene













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top