S. SOUNTHAR
T. K. T. G. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
A. Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 08.12.2016 passed in A.S.No.54 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.09.2014 passed in O.S.No.3 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Vellore.)
The 8th defendant/subsequent purchaser is the appellant. The first respondent herein filed a suit for specific performance. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court and the appeal filed by the first respondent was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, the 8th defendant in the suit is before this Court.
2. Plaint Averment:
According to the first respondent/plaintiff, he entered into a sale agreement dated 05.03.2000 with deceased Duraiammal (first defendant/predecessor of respondents 2 to 4). As per the terms of agreement, the sale consideration was fixed at Rs.9,00,000/-. The first respondent paid a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- on the date of agreement, the time fixed for performance was six months. The said period expired on 04.09.2000. It was further claimed by the first respondent, he paid a further sum of Rs.2,25,000/- to third defendant/third responden
PadmaKumari Vs. Dassayan reported in (2015) 8 SCC 695;
Vijay Kumar Vs. Om Prakash reported in AIR 2018 SC 5098;
Ritu Saxena Vs. J.S.Grover reported in (2019) 9 SCC 132;
C.S.Venkatesh Vs. ASC Murthy reported in (2020) 3 SCC 280;
U.N.Krishnamurthy Vs. A.M.Krishnamurthy reported in AIR 2022 SC 3361;
U.Manjunath Rao Vs. U.Chandrasekar reported in (2017) 15 SCC 309;
Somakka Vs. K.P.Basavaraj reported in (2022) 8 SCC 261;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.