C. KUMARAPPAN
Azhappa Spinning Mills Private Limited, Sankarankovil Road, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Sendaamarai. Rajapalayam – Appellant
Versus
Enforcement Officer, Employee Provident Funds Organization District Office, II Floor, Jawan's Bhavan Police Station Road, Sivakasi – Respondent
ORDER :
(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.Nos.77, 78, 81, 80, 79 and 82 of 2005 dated 05.06.2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam and quash the same.)
1. All the Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.Nos.77, 78, 81, 80, 79 and 82 of 2005, dated 05.06.2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam.
2. Heard Mr.N.Manoharan, for Mr.R.Niresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.Murali Sankar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would vehemently contend that the respondent has initiated the criminal prosecution under Sections 14(A) and 14(1-A) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the alleged dues of the provident fund contribution for the period from October 2001 to March 2002. It is the specific contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that they have leased out the mill to M/s.Sree Preethi Spinners under
Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited Vs. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.
Kailashkumar Radhakrishnan Kanoria & Ors., Vs. State of Gujarat
S.Sampath Kumar Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Devendra Prasad Singh-Vs-State of Bihar & Anr.
The liability of the employer and the transferee, the interpretation of contractual clauses, and the continuing nature of the offense under Section 468 of the Cr.P.C. were crucial in determining the ....
Initiating criminal proceedings before the final adjudication of the dispute would be an abuse of the process of law. Criminal liability arises only after the failure to deposit the determined amount....
A person cannot be held liable for offences committed prior to their appointment, and proper sanction for prosecution is essential under the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1....
The legal point established is that for summons to be issued, the accused must be a natural or juridical person, and specific allegations are necessary for determining vicarious liability.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.