SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Rep. by its Authorized Representative P. Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
R. Selvaraj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
(Prayer: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 22.02.2023 passed in M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.21836 of 2012.)
1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 22.02.2023 made in M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.21836 of 2012.
2. In the said Miscellaneous Petition, the original writ petitioner had made a prayer that the Court would be pleased to cause an inquiry under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the appellant herein and its officials and direct filing of complaint against them. The learned Single Judge passed an order directing the Registry to frame a complaint and file the same before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai. The operative portion of the order contained in paragraphs Nos.17 and 18 reads as hereunder:-
Amarsang Nathaji as himself and as Karta and Manager Vs. Hardik Harshadbhai Patel and Ors.
Chintamani Malviya Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2018) 6 SCC 151
Ram Kishan Fauji Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. (2017) 5 SCC 533
Surendra Gupta Vs. Bhagwan Devi (Smt) and Anr. (1994) 4 SCC 657
Pritish Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.(2002) 1 SCC 253
Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr. Vs. Meenakshi Marwah and Anr.(2005) 4 SCC 370
Jamshed N. Guzdar Vs. State of Maharashtra (2005) 2 SCC 591
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.