IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, J.
V. Girija & Another – Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health & Family Welfare Department, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. Nos. 6411, 6456, 6475, 6461, 6467 & 6468 of 2024 & 6433, 6439, 6442, 6446, 6449 & 6436 of 2024 & WMP. Nos. 7187, 7192, 7120, 7174, 7182 & 7184 of 2024 & 7169, 7153, 7164, 7155, 7160 & 7161 of 2024
Decided On : 14-03-2024
Surrogacy - Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 - Rule 14, Form 2, Amendment to Form 2 - Stay of Amendment - Medical indications necessitating gestational surrogacy - Consent of surrogate mother - Eligibility certificates for surrogacy - Interim order staying the operation of newly substituted Rule 1(d) - Entitlement to proceed with the process of surrogacy
Fact of the Case:
12 couples filed writ petitions seeking mandamus to consider their representations under Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and issue eligibility certificates for surrogacy utilizing the second petitioner's sperm and a donor egg from the proposed surrogate mother.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that an amendment to Form 2, which prohibited the use of donor gametes for surrogacy, was contrary to the main provisions of the Surrogacy Act and stayed the amendment, allowing the petitioners to proceed with the surrogacy process if they fulfilled all other statutory conditions.
Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation and application of Rule 14, Form 2, and the amendment to Form 2, specifically regarding the medical indications necessitating gestational surrogacy and the consent of the surrogate mother.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the inconsistency between the amendment to Form 2 and Rule 14 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, and the court's interpretation of the main provisions of the Surrogacy Act, which led to the stay of the amendment and the entitlement of the petitioners to proceed with the surrogacy process.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were allowed, and the petitioners were entitled to appear before the authorities for requisite medical tests and have their applications processed and ordered expeditiously.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer in W.P.No.6411 of 2024: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 11.10.2023 under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and consequently issue eligibility certificate to the petitioners to undergo surrogacy procedure by utilizing the donor egg to the proposed surrogate mother and the 2nd petitioner's sperm.)
1. W.M.P.Nos.7187, 7192, 7120, 7174, 7182, 7184, 7169, 7153, 7164, 7155, 7160 and 7161 of 2024, filed seeking permission to file a single writ petition are ordered on payment of separate court fee, if not already paid.
2. These writ petitions have been filed by 12 couples seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, being the Director, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services and the third respondent being the Joint Director of Health Service/District Medical Board to consider their representations under Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 ('Act') and issue eligibility certificates to them to undergo the procedure of surrogacy utilizing the second petitioner's sperm and a donor egg from the proposed surrogate mother.
3. The Act provides for constitution of Boards at the National and State level as well as other authorities to regulate the practice and process of surrogacy. The procedure relating to surrogacy is set out in various rules and regulations, including in the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022 (Rules). The Rules, provide, inter alia at Rule 14, that a woman may opt for surrogacy in certain specified medical conditions. Rule 14 reads as follows:-
"14. Medical indications necessitating gestational surrogacy
A woman may opt for surrogacy, if-
(a) she has no uterus or missing uterus or abnormal uterus (like hypoplastic uterus or intrauterine adhesions or thin endometrium or small uni-cornuate uterus, T-shaptd uterus) or if the uterus is surgically removed due to any medical conditions such as gynaecological cancer;
(b) intended parent or woman who has repeatedly failed to conceive after multiple In vitro fertilization or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection attempts, (Recurrent implantation failure);
(c) multiple pregnancy losses resulting from an unexplained medical reason, unexplained graft rejection due to exaggerated immune response;
(d) any illness that makes it impossible for woman to carry a pregnancy to viability or pregnancy that is life threatening."
4. The form of consent in Form 2 is relatable to Rule 7. Rule 7 deals with consent of a surrogate mother. Form 2 is the form of consent of the surrogate mother and the agreement for surrogacy. It contains inter alia various methods of treatment that may be adopted as follows:-
(a) stimulation of the genetic mother for follicular recruitment;
(b) the recovery of one or more oocytes from the genetic mother by ultrasound-guided oocyte recovery or by laparoscopy;
(c) the fertilization of the oocytes from the genetic mother with the sperm of her husband;
(d) the fertilization of a donor oocyte by the sperm of the husband;
(e) the maintenance and storage by cryopreservation of the embryo resulting from such fertilization until, in the view of the medical and scientific staff, it is ready for transfer;
(f) implantation of the embryo obtained through any of the above possibilities into my uterus, after the necessary treatment if any. (emphasis provided)
5. Vide Notification dated 14.03.2023, an amendment was proposed to the Form and existing paragraph 1(d), highlighted in bold above, was substituted as follows:-
"G.S.R.179(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 50 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (47 of 2021), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, further to amend the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022.
.....
1(d) (I) Couple undergoing Surrogacy must have both game
AI
The court's decision emphasized the importance of aligning amendments to subsidiary rules with the main provisions of the Act and ensuring that the statutory conditions for surrogacy are met.
The court affirmed that amendments to surrogacy regulations cannot have retrospective effect, especially when they impede ongoing processes and must align with existing medical regulations.
The court affirmed that the amendment to the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022, which restricts donor gametes, is inapplicable to petitioners with medical conditions, preserving their right to surro....
The impugned rules were found to be contrary to the Surrogacy Act and violated the petitioners' rights under the Constitution of India, leading to the court's decision to allow the petitioners to pro....
Legislative imposition of age eligibility for surrogacy does not infringe fundamental rights, as it serves legitimate interests regarding health and welfare of children born from surrogacy.
Guidelines restricting eligibility certificate issuance for Surrogate mothers to their district of residence are valid under the Surrogacy Regulation Act, ensuring compliance and proper implementatio....
Section 4 deals with regulation of surrogacy and surrogacy procedures.
The court determines that the retrospective application of surrogacy rules conflicting with existing provisions recognizing disabilities is improper, necessitating medical certification for those aff....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.