IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Smt. XXXX, Wife of XXXX – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.15824 OF 2023 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.22462 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.20476 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.20492 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22468 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22470 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22511 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22515 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22530 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22533 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22536 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22624 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.22631 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
Decided on : 18-11-2023
ORDER :
“All love begins and ends with motherhood, by which a woman plays the God. Glorious it is as the gift of nature, being both sacrosanct and sacrificial, though; now again, science has for and sacrificial, though; now again, science has forced us to alter our perspective of motherhood”.- ROBERT BROWN.
Science or scientific development never ceases to surprise us; it always outmaneuvers us. We humans, therefore, should either change or become immaterial. Law is no exception. It is now the turn of law to appreciate, the variance in the concept of the divine duty, of motherhood metamorphosing, into split motherhood, albeit, in certain circumstances. The turn to appreciate this dichotomy forms the fulcrum of the issue in the lis and becomes the kernel of the conundrum.
2. Conglomeration of these cases raise a common challenge. The petitioners, in all these cases, seek to challenge the amendment brought about to the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022, in terms of the notification dated 14-03-2023 issued by the Union of India, with particular challenge to the amendment to clause (1)(d) of Form No.2 of the Surrogacy Regulations. Therefore, they are considered together by this common order. I deem it appropriate to notice the facts petition by petition.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
W.P.No.15824 of 2023:
The petitioners are again husband and wife who get married in the year 2007. Being desirous of expanding their family, tired to conceive naturally, but have been unsuccessful for the last 16 years since the 1st petitioner is having bulky uterus with thick endometrium which hindered conceiving naturally. Therefore, are left with the only option surrogacy. Since, the notification prohibits it, they call in question the notification, as in the companion petitions.
W.P.No.22462 of 2023:
This petition is taken up as the lead petition. The petitioners get married on 26-05-2014. The 1st petitioner desirous of motherhood tries to conceive a child naturally and has been unsuccessful for the last 9 years. It is the averment in the petition that several unsuccessful procedures between the years 2019 and 2021 using her own eggs and her husband’s sperm resulted in successful pregnancy, but suffered from early miscarriage and had to undergo 3 laparoscopic surgeries to her uterus. It is averred that despite considerable efforts, her uterus still harbors multiple uterine fibroids that intrude upon the uterine cavity. All efforts have been in vain, the risk of miscarriage looms large on every ensuing pregnancy is the medical opinion. Therefore, it is a case where the 1st petitioner cannot naturally conceive. Left with no choice the viable option left was surrogacy, but the impugned notification comes in the way of the intending couple, in as much as it prohibits using of a donor egg during surrogacy.
W.P.No.20476 of 2023:
The petitioners get married on 16-11-2016. Efforts of 7 years have led the couple nowhere for expansion of the family due to the 1st petitioner being a patient of “CKD” – Chronic Kidney Disease. Therefore, the grave medical condition has left the couple with no choice, but to opt for surrogacy. The option is taken away by the impugned notification.
W.P.No.20492 of 2023:
The petitioners are husband and wife having got married in the year 2018 and all the efforts of expansion of family have been in vain due to poor heart condition of the 1st petitioner. Therefore, the only method of becoming a mother was through surrogacy, which also is now rendered impossible due to the impugned notification. The impossibility is what has driven the petitioners to this Court.
W.P.No.22468 of 2023:
The petitioners are a couple who have got married on 12-10-2017 and have been unsuccessful for the last 6 years to expand the family on account of poor ovarian reserve and low quality of eggs. All methods medically av
Additional District Magistrate (Rev.) Delhi Admn. v. Siri Ram reported in (2000) 5 SCC 451
BABY MANJI YAMADA V. UNION OF INDIA
DEVIKA BISWAS V. UNION OF INDIA
General Officer Commanding-in-Chief v. Dr. Subhash Chandra Yadav reported in (1988) 2 SCC 351
AI
The court affirmed that the amendment to the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022, which restricts donor gametes, is inapplicable to petitioners with medical conditions, preserving their right to surro....
The impugned rules were found to be contrary to the Surrogacy Act and violated the petitioners' rights under the Constitution of India, leading to the court's decision to allow the petitioners to pro....
Section 4 deals with regulation of surrogacy and surrogacy procedures.
The court affirmed that amendments to surrogacy regulations cannot have retrospective effect, especially when they impede ongoing processes and must align with existing medical regulations.
Age restrictions in surrogacy laws cannot be applied retrospectively to couples who initiated processes prior to enactment, preserving their reproductive rights under constitutional protections.
Guidelines restricting eligibility certificate issuance for Surrogate mothers to their district of residence are valid under the Surrogacy Regulation Act, ensuring compliance and proper implementatio....
Upper age limits in Surrogacy Act are constitutionally valid, reasonable restrictions protecting child welfare and health.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.