ORDER :

“All love begins and ends with motherhood, by which a woman plays the God. Glorious it is as the gift of nature, being both sacrosanct and sacrificial, though; now again, science has forced us to alter our perspective of motherhood,” says Robert Brown. The altered perspective is what forms the kernel of this conundrum.

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question validity of Section 2(1)(zg) and Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts in brief, are as follows:

The petitioners are husband and wife, from their wedlock had a son. The mother owing to certain health problems, undergoes surgery for removal of her uterus and, therefore, the uterus is no longer a part of the body of the mother. The son of the petitioners, completes his MBBS course and was undergoing internship at a College in Mangalore. The son on 13-12-2022, dies due to a road traffic accident. The couple on losing their son go into depression.

3. The 1st petitioner is working as a First Division Assistant in the Government Arts College, Bengaluru and the second petitioner is a home maker and a bus