SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 811

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR, JJ.
S. Anbananthan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Perambalur & Others – Respondents
WA Nos. 203 & 205 of 2023 & CMP Nos. 405 & 2065 of 2023
Decided on : 27-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Balan Haridas, Advocate
For the Respondents: A. Selvendran, Special Government Pleader.

The court reaffirmed that the government holds the authority to regulate Grama Natham lands to prevent encroachment and misuse, emphasizing the necessity of documentation for ownership claims.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Reclassification of land - Petitioner claiming rights over 'Grama Natham' land which was reclassified by the Government - The Government rejected the petitioner's application for patta, stating that land was allotted for public purposes and not for private use. (Paras 10, 90, 91).

(B) Rights over Grama Natham Lands - Historical and legal context of Grama Natham lands expounded upon, emphasizing the Government's authority to regulate and prevent encroachment while maintaining public good. (Paras 78, 79, 81, 84).

(C) Legal Duties of the State - The state has an inherent duty to regulate land use for the welfare of the poor while preventing illegal encroachments to protect Grama Natham lands. (Paras 79, 80, 86).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner asserted possession of 'Grama Natham' land for 40 years. The District Collector rejected the application for patta owing to reclassification of said land as 'Government Land' for public purposes.

Findings of Court:
The Court underscored that even if the petitioner occupied the land, the Government’s reclassification barred private claims. The indispensable right to regulate such lands lies with the Government.

Issues: The core questions debated were the legality of the reclassification of Grama Natham land and the Government's right to use it for public projects versus private claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court elucidated that Grama Natham lands are under governmental regulation, and valid legal ownership must be substantiated by proper documentation; otherwise, claims are unfounded under the current legal framework.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. occupancy rights over grama natham lands. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. government's regulatory role in grama natham lands. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. definition and historical context of grama natham. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. authority of government over land assignment. (Para 15 , 16)
5. legal frameworks around land revenue and classification. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

S.M. Subramaniam, J.

(Prayers WA No.203 of 2023 : is preferred under Clause 15 of LETTERS PATENT Act, against the order passed by this Court in WP No.5723 of 2020 dated 04.08.2022.

WA No.205 of 2023 is preferred under Clause 15 of LETTERS PATENT Act, against the order passed by this Court in WP No.17812 of 2022 dated 04.08.2022.)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) FACTS IN BRIEF

2) HARMONIOUS INTERPRETATION OF “GRAMA NATHAM”

A. PREAMBLE

B. DEFINITION

C. DISPOSAL OF GRAMA NATHAM LANDS BY THE STATE

3) A BRIEF HISTORY OF LAND REVENUE SETTLEMENT IN THE STATE

A. SURVEYS IN TAMIL NADU

B. UPDATING OF REGISTRY SCHEME

4) TAMIL NADU LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT, 1905

5) NATHAM SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT

6) JUDGMENTS RECOGNIZES THE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS GRAMA NATHAM LANDS

7) GRAMA NATHAM IN THE ESTATE ABOLITION ACTS

8) VIEWS/JUDGMENTS THAT THE STATE HAS NO RIGHTS ON GRAMA NATHAM LANDS

A.CASE DETAILS WITH THE GROUND OF DISTINCTION

9) DISCUSSIONS

10) CONCLUSION

1) FACTS IN BRIEF:

The writ petitioner is the appellant before us.

2. Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the subject land in S.No.506/2024 Door No.11, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kurumbalur Village, Perambalur Taluk, is classified as 'Grama Natham' and the appellant is in possession of five cents of 'Grama Natham' lands. The petitioner is residing there for about 40 years.

3. The petitioner has submitted an application for issuance of patta, which was rejected by the District Collector, on the ground that the said 'Grama Natham' land was reclassified as 'Sarkar Land' (vacant land). Challenging the said reclassification, the writ petition has been filed.

4. The Writ Court considered the judgments relied on by the appellant and formed an opinion that the Government has reclassified 'Grama Natham' land as 'Government Land'. The Writ Court held that reclassification, cannot be interfered with. However, possession of the appellant in the 'Grama Natham' land was upheld.

5. Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel for the appellant, would rely on certain judgments, to show that the 'Grama Natham' lands do not vest with the Government. Therefore, occupants of 'Grama Natham' land hold right over the property.

6. Since these lands are not assessed, they are kept vacant and subsequently classified as 'Grama Natham' for the purpose of housesite to poor homeless people. Assignment of such 'Grama Natham' lands to needy poor people are to be made by following the procedures contemplated under the REVENUE STANDING ORDER No.21 [RSO No.21]. The procedures are contemplated under RSO No.21, would elaborately provide the eligibility and the extent of land, which can be alienated as house sites to the poor needy people.

7. When 'Grama Natham' lands are regulated under RSO No.21, an individual, who is in occupation, cannot claim as if he is the owner of the land. The Government is empowered to regulate all 'Grama Natham' lands across the State by following the procedures as contemplated under RSO No.21.

8. There are conflicting decisions that “Grama Natham Lands” do not vest with the Government. Larger extent of lands across the State of Tamil Nadu are grabbed by private individuals and by greedy men under the pretext that they are 'Grama Natham' lands. There are many orders passed by the learned Single Judge granting patta in favour of the occupants of 'Grama Natham' lands on the ground that 'Grama Natham' lands do no

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top