IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR, JJ.
S. Anbananthan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Perambalur & Others – Respondents
WA Nos. 203 & 205 of 2023 & CMP Nos. 405 & 2065 of 2023
Decided on : 27-03-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. occupancy rights over grama natham lands. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. government's regulatory role in grama natham lands. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. definition and historical context of grama natham. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. authority of government over land assignment. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. legal frameworks around land revenue and classification. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
(Prayers WA No.203 of 2023 : is preferred under Clause 15 of LETTERS PATENT Act, against the order passed by this Court in WP No.5723 of 2020 dated 04.08.2022.
WA No.205 of 2023 is preferred under Clause 15 of LETTERS PATENT Act, against the order passed by this Court in WP No.17812 of 2022 dated 04.08.2022.)
|
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| 1) FACTS IN BRIEF | |
| 2) HARMONIOUS INTERPRETATION OF “GRAMA NATHAM” | |
| A. PREAMBLE | |
| B. DEFINITION | |
| C. DISPOSAL OF GRAMA NATHAM LANDS BY THE STATE | |
| 3) A BRIEF HISTORY OF LAND REVENUE SETTLEMENT IN THE STATE | |
| A. SURVEYS IN TAMIL NADU | |
| B. UPDATING OF REGISTRY SCHEME | |
| 4) TAMIL NADU LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT, 1905 | |
| 5) NATHAM SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT | |
| 6) JUDGMENTS RECOGNIZES THE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS GRAMA NATHAM LANDS | |
| 7) GRAMA NATHAM IN THE ESTATE ABOLITION ACTS | |
| 8) VIEWS/JUDGMENTS THAT THE STATE HAS NO RIGHTS ON GRAMA NATHAM LANDS | |
| A.CASE DETAILS WITH THE GROUND OF DISTINCTION | |
| 9) DISCUSSIONS | |
| 10) CONCLUSION | |
1) FACTS IN BRIEF:
The writ petitioner is the appellant before us.
2. Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the subject land in S.No.506/2024 Door No.11, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kurumbalur Village, Perambalur Taluk, is classified as 'Grama Natham' and the appellant is in possession of five cents of 'Grama Natham' lands. The petitioner is residing there for about 40 years.
3. The petitioner has submitted an application for issuance of patta, which was rejected by the District Collector, on the ground that the said 'Grama Natham' land was reclassified as 'Sarkar Land' (vacant land). Challenging the said reclassification, the writ petition has been filed.
4. The Writ Court considered the judgments relied on by the appellant and formed an opinion that the Government has reclassified 'Grama Natham' land as 'Government Land'. The Writ Court held that reclassification, cannot be interfered with. However, possession of the appellant in the 'Grama Natham' land was upheld.
5. Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel for the appellant, would rely on certain judgments, to show that the 'Grama Natham' lands do not vest with the Government. Therefore, occupants of 'Grama Natham' land hold right over the property.
6. Since these lands are not assessed, they are kept vacant and subsequently classified as 'Grama Natham' for the purpose of housesite to poor homeless people. Assignment of such 'Grama Natham' lands to needy poor people are to be made by following the procedures contemplated under the REVENUE STANDING ORDER No.21 [RSO No.21]. The procedures are contemplated under RSO No.21, would elaborately provide the eligibility and the extent of land, which can be alienated as house sites to the poor needy people.
7. When 'Grama Natham' lands are regulated under RSO No.21, an individual, who is in occupation, cannot claim as if he is the owner of the land. The Government is empowered to regulate all 'Grama Natham' lands across the State by following the procedures as contemplated under RSO No.21.
8. There are conflicting decisions that “Grama Natham Lands” do not vest with the Government. Larger extent of lands across the State of Tamil Nadu are grabbed by private individuals and by greedy men under the pretext that they are 'Grama Natham' lands. There are many orders passed by the learned Single Judge granting patta in favour of the occupants of 'Grama Natham' lands on the ground that 'Grama Natham' lands do no
Corporation of Chennai vs. K.Narasa Reddy [(2012) 4 MLJ 646]
Collector of Godaveri District vs. Rangayya [AIR 1929 Mad 441]
N.S.Kuppuswamy Odayar Vs The Narthangudi Panchayat [MANU/TN/0303/1970 : 1971 (1) MLJ 190]
Palani Ammal Vs L.Sethurama Aiyangar [MANU/TN/0191/1949 : 1949 (1) MLJ 290]
Rengaraja Iyengar vs. Achikannu Ammal [MANU/TN/0492/1959 : 1959 (2) MLJ 513]
State of Madras Vs Kasthuri Ammal [MANU/TN/0531/1973 : 1974 (87) LW 531]
Occupied residential village habitation lands are private holdings and do not vest with the state. Consequently, the summary eviction power granted under the land encroachment legislation cannot be i....
Ownership of Natham land cannot be claimed by mere occupation; regulatory authority rests with the Government to issue land assignments judiciously and effectively.
The court established that 'Grama Natham' lands are public properties that cannot be claimed by individuals for personal use, and the government has a duty to protect these lands from encroachment.
Occupation of natham land does not confer ownership; claims based on forged documents are invalid under government regulations.
Mere occupation of Natham land does not confer ownership; legal title must stem from lawful government grant. Forged documents undermine claims.
Natham Poramboke lands are designated for residential use only and cannot be exploited for commercial purposes; unauthorized occupants are considered encroachers and may be evicted under governing la....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Gramanatham lands are private interest lands and do not vest with the Government, and the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, ....
Grama natham lands occupied and recognized by the State confer private ownership to occupants, distinguishing them from unoccupied lands that vest with the State.
Ownership of Grama Natham land requires valid documentation; mere possession does not confer title or entitlement to compensation.
Grama Natham lands assigned under the Natham scheme remain with the occupant despite allegations of commercial use unless large-scale exploitation is established.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.