Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR
K. Shanmugavel Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Prayer in W.P.No.7594 of 2011: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,calling for the records relating to the G.O.(Ms.) No.1177 Commercial Taxes& Religious Endowment Department dated 30.10.1987 and G.O.No.(General)No.1971 Revenue (SSII) Department dated 14.10.1988 and pursuant followed by above G.O's consequentially issued by present G.O.(Ms.) No.760 Revenue (SSIV) Department dated 19.12.2007 & G.O.(2D).No.37 Revenue (SSIV) Department dated 29.01.2009 issued by the first respondent and quash the same as ultra virus and consequently forbear the respondents and their subordinates, from any way restrict or control to refuse grant patta or survey of the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the land ad measuring 6 Acres in S.No.210/2, Grama Natham, at Pozhichallur minor inam Village, Alandur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
Prayer in W.P.No.7595 of 2011: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Declaration, call for the records from the 6th respondent and declaring that the Grama Natham survey entire
The court established that 'Grama Natham' lands are public properties that cannot be claimed by individuals for personal use, and the government has a duty to protect these lands from encroachment.
Natham Poramboke lands are designated for residential use only and cannot be exploited for commercial purposes; unauthorized occupants are considered encroachers and may be evicted under governing la....
Occupied residential village habitation lands are private holdings and do not vest with the state. Consequently, the summary eviction power granted under the land encroachment legislation cannot be i....
Occupation of natham land does not confer ownership; claims based on forged documents are invalid under government regulations.
Ownership of Natham land cannot be claimed by mere occupation; regulatory authority rests with the Government to issue land assignments judiciously and effectively.
Mere occupation of Natham land does not confer ownership; legal title must stem from lawful government grant. Forged documents undermine claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Gramanatham lands are private interest lands and do not vest with the Government, and the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, ....
Ownership of Grama Natham land requires valid documentation; mere possession does not confer title or entitlement to compensation.
Grama natham lands occupied and recognized by the State confer private ownership to occupants, distinguishing them from unoccupied lands that vest with the State.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
