IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR, JJ.
Vijayalakshmipuram Thittapaguthi Kudiyurppu Manai Yrimalyalagal Sangam, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer, Chennai District, Chennai & Others – Respondents
WP No. 13100 of 2023 & WMP No. 12864 of 2023
Decided on : 18-03-2024
Encroachment - Government Poramboke Lands - Anadheenam, Circar Punjai - A5/4568/2022, Na.Ka.No.J8/2876/2023 - The court discussed the encroachments on government poramboke lands, public streets, and watercourse porambokes. It highlighted the duty of Revenue Authorities to protect government lands and the need for vigilance in dealing with encroachments and fraudulent documents. The court directed the authorities to conduct a survey, issue notices to encroachers, and remove identified encroachments within twelve weeks.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition was filed to quash an order related to encroachments on government poramboke lands, specifically public streets. The petitioner alleged unauthorized construction and issuance of patta based on erroneous sale deed. The Revenue Divisional Officer confirmed encroachments and directed a survey to remove encroachments.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the authorities to conduct a survey, issue notices to encroachers, and remove identified encroachments within twelve weeks.
Issues: Encroachments on government poramboke lands, unauthorized construction, issuance of patta based on erroneous sale deed, duty of Revenue Authorities to protect government lands, and fraudulent documents.
Ratio Decidendi: The duty of Revenue Authorities to protect government lands, the need for vigilance in dealing with encroachments and fraudulent documents, and the directive to conduct a survey and remove identified encroachments within twelve weeks.
Final Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of with a directive for the authorities to conduct a survey, issue notices to encroachers, and remove identified encroachments within twelve weeks. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
JUDGMENT :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.J8/2876/2023 dated 31.03.2023 and quash the same.)
1. The present writ petition has been instituted to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.J8/2876/2023 dated 31.03.2023 and quash the same.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that larger extent of Government poramboke lands are under encroachments, more specifically, public streets. By encroaching upon public streets, unauthorised buildings are constructed and thereby depriving the people of that locality to have free access to the road. The petitioner would further submit that a Sale Deed was registered in violation of revenue records, which was existing and based on such Sale Deed, patta was granted erroneously. Subsequently, the Authorities came to know that patta was granted in respect of Government poramboke lands and action was taken to cancel the patta. Several such persons have encroached upon public lands and streets.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that private respondents in writ petitions are also encroachers, encroached upon Government poramboke lands and constructed buildings.
4. The counter filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Central Chennai Division, reveals that encroachments are identified and the relevant paragraphs 11, 13 and 15 in the counter are extracted as under:-
“11. It is respectfully submitted that the subject land involved in the said writ petition along with certain other lands originally measuring 6.47 acres of land in S.No.168/3, stood classified as 'Anadheenam' and classified as 'Circar Punjai' in the 'A' Register maintained by the Revenue Department and registered in the name of one by name Narasimhan. The subject land was assigned Old 168/3E part and 168/3F part of Oragadam Village and was meant for M.C.Raja Road. Though the petitioner herein claims that the said land was settled in her favour by the Settlement Officer, it cannot be accepted in the absence of the said order of settlement. Besides this, the second respondent herein had observed that the said land in S.No.168/3 was measuring 331 q.meters and that patta was issued only based on the document produced by the petitioner herein. Hence, the second respondent in her proceedings issued in A5/4568/2022 dated 07.12.2022 had ordered to cancel the patta issued to the petitioner herein.
13. It is respectfully submitted that in pursuance of the said order, the said land was inspected by the second respondent herein. The petitioner herein claims to have purchased a total extent of 8579 sq.feet of land by virtue of the following documents:-
15. It is respectfully submitted that during inspection, it was found that the petitioner is still encroaching upon an extent of 220.30 sq.meters (equivalent to 237 sq.feet) (Orange colour in sketch) of land lying on the Western side of T.S.No.127/2 leaving an extent of 110.70 sq.meters (equivalent to 1192 sq.feet) (Yellow colour in sketch) lying on the Eastern side of T.S.No.127/2. The Greater Chennai Corporation officials have laid a concrete road in the Eastern portion measuring 110.70 sq.meters in T.S.No.127/2 part of Block No.43 Ward 'A' of Oragadam Village as more particularly described in the sketch submitted herewith.”
5. It is needless to state that Revenue Authorities are duty bound to protect Government lands, roads, water course poramboke etc., within their jurisdiction. Any collusion or inaction, are to be construed as lapses, negligence and dereliction of duty, warranting departmental disciplinary proceedings against all such erred officials.
6. On account of sky-rocketing of market value of lands in the outskirts of Chennai City, greedy men are tempted to grab pu
AI
Duty of Revenue Authorities to protect government lands and the need for vigilance in dealing with encroachments and fraudulent documents.
Duty of Revenue Authorities to protect Government lands and take action against encroachments, and the need for vigilance in dealing with encroachments and violations to protect public properties.
The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 does not extend to adjudicating ownership disputes relating to immovable property, which must be resolved in civil courts.
Court emphasized lawful processes and protections regarding government land against encroachments, highlighting the necessity of compliance with regulations for land possession.
Revenue authorities must follow statutory procedures to remove encroachments on Sarkar Poramboke Land as demonstrated in a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Authorities must remove identified encroachments on government poramboke land under relevant Act after hearings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.