N. ANAND VENKATESH
Suo Motu – Appellant
Versus
State, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Chennai City-I Department – Respondent
ORDER :
N. Anand Venkatesh, J.
| INDEX | ||
| S.No. | Description | Page No. |
| I | Facts leading to the Suo Motu proceedings | 3 |
| II. | First Set of Discharge Petitions | 7 |
| III. | Initiation of Suo Motu Proceedings | 15 |
| IV. | Submissions | 16 |
| V. | Suo Motu Revisional Jurisdiction | 21 |
| VI. | Grounds in the II Discharge petition | 25 |
| VII. | Order passed in the II Discharge petition | 28 |
| VIII. | Questions for Consideration i. Maintainability of the Second Discharge Petition ii. Sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C iii. Sanction under Section 19 of the P.C Act, 1988 | 31 |
| IX. | Conclusions and Directions | 52 |
I. FACTS LEADING TO THE SUO MOTO PROCEEDINGS
1. This suo motu revision, under Section 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against an order dated 17.03.2023 passed by the Additional Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu at Chennai (hereinafter the “Special Court”) in Cr.M.P 4204 of 2023 in C.C. 13 of 2019 discharging
Ratilal Bhanji Mithani v. State of Maharashtra
Eknath Shankarrao Mukkawar v. State of Maharashtra
Ratilal Bhanji Mithani v. State of Maharashtra and Others
K. Selvam v State (2010) Cr.LJ 3240
Padma Sundara Rao v. State of T.N.
Herrington v. British Railways Board [(1972) 2 WLR 537 : 1972 AC 877 (HL)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.