SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1356

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A. Rosemary – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, by its Secretary, School Education Department – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents: T. Amjad Khan.

ORDER :

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order of the third respondent Na.Ka.No. 462/A5/2017, dated 27.04.2017 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to continue the service till 31.05.2017.

1. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents would submit that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has now become infructuous, since the extension sought for by the petitioner which has been rejected under the impugned order has also got expired.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner had sought for extension of the service by another period of five months from 01.05.2017 to 31.05.2017. The petitioner has also retired from service on 30.04.2017. Therefore, it is clear that the prayer sought for in this writ petition cannot be granted. Hence, this Writ Petition has now become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequentl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top