SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1760

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
M. Ahamed Shahjahan – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pujha S.
For the Respondents: C.K. Chandrasekkar, M.R. Thangavel.

ORDER :

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to take action against the 3rd respondent for the misconduct of the 3rd respondent on the basis of the complaints and misusing the name of the 2nd respondent association including action for interim suspension of practice or any other appropriate remedy or relief as this Honorable Court directs.

1. Mr. C.K. Chandrasekkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent would submit that the 3rd respondent died and cause became vanished. Thus, this Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top