SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1336

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A. Kanthasamy – Appellant
Versus
Director of Elementary Education, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: S. Gokul Raj, G. Mohankumar.
For the Respondent: T. Amjad Khan.

ORDER :

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass orders on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner dated 04.07.2016 within the time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition on the ground that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the then third respondent who has been impleaded as fourth respondent in this writ petition has now got superannuated. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top