S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
K. Muthuvijayarani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 28.07.2017 passed in W.P.No.18681 of 2014.
The present intra-court appeal has been instituted challenging the order dated 28.07.2017 passed in W.P.No.18681 of 2014.
2. The respondent was engaged as Female Escort Warder on daily wage basis. Admittedly, the respondent was engaged on need basis and without break in service. The details of the services rendered by the respondent as daily wage Female Escort Warder is as under:
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | Break in service |
| 2000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 12 | 19 |
| 2001 | 30 | 28 | 18 | 25 | 2 | 26 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 28 | 15 | 18 | 277 | 88 |
| 2002 | 22 | - | 23 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 18 | 13 | 25 | 22 | 9 | 249 | 116 |
| 2003 | 15 | - | - | - | 27 | 30 | 29 | 27 | 30 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 224 | 141 |
| 2004 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 29 | 27 | 28 | 28 | 20 | 26 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 336 | 29 |
| 2005 | 30 | 26 | 29 | 28 | 18 | 26 | 21 | 28 | 28 | 30 | 29 | 29 | 322 | 43 |
| 2006 | 28 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh
State of Haryana v. Ram Kumar Mann
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi reported in 2006 (4) SCC 1
State of Rajasthan & Ors V.Dayala Lal & Ors.
State of Rajasthan Vs. Daya Lal
Union of India & Ors. Vs. A.S.Pillai & Ors.
Regularisation of employment requires adherence to constitutional provisions and recruitment rules, specifically against sanctioned posts.
The court established that regularization of temporary employees must comply with constitutional mandates, ensuring equal opportunity and adherence to service rules.
Point of law: Doctrine of equal pay for equal work, as adumbrated under Article 39(d) of the Constitution of India read with Article 14 thereof, cannot be applied in a vacuum. The constitutional sche....
Appointments in public service must comply with constitutional mandates and recruitment rules; backdoor appointments cannot be regularized.
The court ruled that employees employed for lengthy periods cannot be denied regularization of service, emphasizing principles of fairness and equality under the Constitution.
Regularization of employees engaged for over ten years without interim court orders is mandated; exploitative contractual practices are disallowed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of legal appointments, the prohibition of perpetuating illegality through regularization, and the guarantee of equal opportunities f....
In order that a mandamus may issue to compel the authorities to do something, it must be shown that the statute imposes a legal duty on the authority and the aggrieved party had a legal right under t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.