JUDGMENT :

Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.

1. Heard finally.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 1-8-2016, by which the claim of the petitioner for regularization has been rejected.

3. It is the case of the petitioner, that the elder brother of the Petitioner was working as Part time Waterman on daily wages in the office of District Treasury. He died in the year 1997, therefore, the petitioner was engaged as daily rated Waterman. Later on, he was discontinued in the year 2000 and thereafter, on the orders of the Collector, he was once again re-engaged as part time labourer at half of the collectorate rates.

4. Thereafter, the petitioner applied for regularization of his services, however, his claim has been rejected by the impugned order.

5. Challenging the impugned order dated 1-8-2016, it is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed as Part time Waterman in the year 1997 and continued till 2000. Again in the year 2001, the petitioner moved an application for his re-engagement and the Collector, by considering the application in sympathetic manner, directed for his re-engagement as part ti