SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1478

S. SOUNTHAR
Kaliammal – Appellant
Versus
Muniyasamy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Mohamed Ibran Saibu for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondent: Mr.PT.S.Narendra Vasan

JUDGMENT :

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.96 of 2006, dated 15.6.2007, on the file of Sub-Court, Ramanathapuram confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.88 of 2001, dated 7.9.2006, on the file of District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram.

This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.96 of 2006, dated 15.06.2007, on the file of Sub-Court, Ramanathapuram confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.88 of 2001, dated 7.9.2006, on the file of District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Plaintiff in the suit is the appellant. The appellant filed the suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff has preferred a first appeal and the First Appellate Court affirmed the findings of the trial Court

3. According to the plaintiff, the suit property was originally assigned in favour of her mother Aundichi and she executed a ‘Will’ in favour of the plaintiff in the year 1963 bequeathing the suit property in favour of the plaintiff. It was claimed by the plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top