Back
R. SAKTHIVEL
D. Murali – Appellant
Versus
D. Kannan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated September 18, 2018 passed in A.S.No.311 of 2014 by the learned I Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, whereby the Judgment and Decree dated December 23, 2011 passed in O.S.No.2983 of 2009 by the V Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai, was reversed.
This Second Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated September 18, 2018 passed in A.S.No.311 of 2014 by the 'I Additional City Civil Court Judge, Chennai' ['First Appellate Court' for brevity], whereby the Judgment and Decree dated December 23, 2011 passed in O.S.No.2983 of 2009 by the ‘V Assistant City Civil Court Judge at Chennai' ['Trial Court' for brevity] was reversed.
2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.
Plaintiff's Case
3. The plaintiff is the absolute owner of the Suit Property. The plaintiff was working as a Fitter in Simpson Company, Chennai. The Suit Property was allotted to the plaintiff in the year 1989 under the 'Scheme of Subsidized Rate of Construction of House to Labourers and Economic
Legal heirs of an original allottee are co-owners of the property, and a Sale Deed in favor of one heir does not confer exclusive title over the property.
The court affirmed that a Sale Deed is valid only for the share owned by the vendor, and a party can challenge findings of a lower court even without filing a cross-appeal.
A plaintiff must establish a jural relationship of landlord-tenant to claim possession; failure to prove tenancy and title leads to dismissal of eviction suits.
The distinction between judgment in rem and judgment in personam, and the binding nature of judgment in rem on anyone claiming interest in the property.
The court reaffirmed that personal laws govern inheritance claims despite statutory provisions; fraudulent documents invalidate subsequent property claims.
Once property is sold, the title passes to the purchaser, and original owners cannot later claim rights over the property.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of valid documentation for establishing property ownership and highlights the contradictory nature of claiming adverse possession against one's own property.
The court affirmed that possession and familial relationships are critical in determining property rights, overruling the First Appellate Court's decision that disregarded these factors.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
