Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
National Failaria Control Programme Mazdoor – Appellant
Versus
Director of Health Service, Office of the Director of Health Service – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 20.12.2018 made in W.P.No.3193 of 2008 on the file of this Court by allowing the above writ appeal.
The writ appeal has been instituted by an Employees Association represented by its President. The members of the petitioner / Association were initially engaged as contingent employees and served under the scheme for eradication of Filariasis disease. Considering the length of their temporary service on contingent basis, the Government took a decision and regularised the services of these temporary employees in sanctioned posts in time scale of pay. It is not in dispute that the services of the contingent employees were regularised in between the year 1987 and 1993.
2. The employees through their Association instituted writ proceedings in the year 2008 and after a lapse of 15 years seeking relief of retrospective regularisation from the date of their respective initial appointment as contingent employee including monetary benefits.
3. Mr.Arun, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the benefit of retrospective regularisation was extended to similarly placed
The court upheld a contingent worker's right to regularization as per the government scheme, ensuring equal treatment and addressing grievances over unequal benefits.
The court established that employees in similar situations must be treated equally regarding regularization, enforcing compliance with prior judgments within specified timeliness.
The petitioners cannot claim regularization of their services from the date of initial appointment and were entitled to count only half of their service rendered in consolidated pay posts for pension....
Petitioner's eligibility for regularization is affirmed based on service duration and prior government schemes, reinforcing principles of equity and fair treatment in employment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that similarly situated employees are entitled to the regularization of their services, and adverse awards against them can be set aside to deem th....
Employees' right to regularization is preserved under prior Government Orders, affirming entitlements from initial hiring dates despite administrative delays.
Pre-regularization service - claim of the employee should have been considered immediately if not through pre-regularization services and get counted for the purpose of terminal benefits
The court ruled on the necessity of equitable treatment in employment regularization, confirming eligibility under the established scheme and the obligation to address disparities in treatment among ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
