SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1716

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
V. Ragul – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry – Respondent
W.P.No.16141 of 2024
Decided on : 21-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar
For the Respondent: Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar Standing Counsel for Bar Council

IMPORTANT POINT
Full disclosure of criminal involvement is essential for enrollment as an Advocate, and failure to disclose such information can lead to dismissal of the application.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Enrollment as Advocate - The court addressed the petitioner's request for enrollment as an Advocate, highlighting the importance of full disclosure regarding criminal involvement in the application process. The court noted that the petitioner had suppressed relevant information, which influenced the decision to dismiss the petition as withdrawn.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to allow enrollment as an Advocate, referencing an application submitted to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had suppressed information regarding involvement in a criminal case, which is a critical factor in the enrollment process.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be allowed to enroll as an Advocate despite the suppression of relevant information regarding criminal involvement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of full disclosure in applications for enrollment as an Advocate, indicating that suppression of material facts undermines the integrity of the application process.

Result: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner.

ORDER :

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to enroll as an Advocate by considering the Petitioners enrollment Application No. PR/2023/33748 dated 30.09.2023 in accordance with law.

The original application submitted by the petitioner to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry produced by Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry would reveal that the petitioner has suppressed the fact regarding his involvement in the criminal case.

2. At this juncture, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has chosen to withdraw the writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top