Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
V. Ragul – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry – Respondent
ORDER :
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to enroll as an Advocate by considering the Petitioners enrollment Application No. PR/2023/33748 dated 30.09.2023 in accordance with law.
The original application submitted by the petitioner to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry produced by Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry would reveal that the petitioner has suppressed the fact regarding his involvement in the criminal case.
2. At this juncture, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has chosen to withdraw the writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Full disclosure of criminal involvement is essential for enrollment as an Advocate, and failure to disclose such information can lead to dismissal of the application.
The pendency of a criminal case against an applicant serves as a bar to enrollment as an advocate before the Bar Council.
A writ of mandamus is not maintainable when the matter has already been adjudicated by the appropriate authority.
The eligibility for enrollment as an advocate under the Advocates Act is contingent upon compliance with specific disqualifications, particularly concerning concurrent employment in government servic....
A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to its dismissal without further examination.
The court affirmed that pending criminal cases can disqualify candidates from enrollment as advocates, emphasizing the need for integrity in the legal profession.
The Bar Council of India has the authority to adjudicate disputes regarding the enrolment of advocates, and the court will not intervene in disputed factual matters pending before it.
The Bar Council is mandated to investigate complaints against advocates and enforce prohibitory orders to maintain the integrity of the legal profession.
The misuse of the advocate emblem by an individual not duly enrolled as an advocate constitutes a violation of legal provisions, warranting investigation and action by relevant authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
