SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1728

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
K.Kokila – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, The Bar Council of India – Respondent
WP.No.2758 of 2022
Decided on : 13-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Respondents: Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar Standing Counsel

IMPORTANT POINT
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear and show interest in the proceedings.

Headnote:

DISMISSAL - WRIT PETITION - The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple occasions, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The court emphasized the importance of the petitioner's presence in legal proceedings and the consequences of failing to engage with the court process.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider a representation for a certified copy of a certificate of practice.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the petitioner did not appear for the hearing on two scheduled dates, which led to the conclusion that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the case.

Issues: Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence in court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the absence of the petitioner on multiple occasions justified the dismissal of the writ petition, reinforcing the principle that parties must actively engage in the legal process.

Result: The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs.

ORDER :

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 29.01.2022 to grant a certified copy of certificate of practice in the petitioner name bearing AIBE Roll No.:63213261 as per the due process of law within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and pass such further other order as this Hon'ble Court deem fit.

When the matter was listed for hearing on 11.06.2024, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In order to give opportunity to the petitioner, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list this matter under the caption “For Dismissal” on 13.06.2024.

2. Even today i.e., on 13.06.2024, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. Thus, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition in W.P.No.2758 of 2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top