Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
K. Kokila – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, The Bar Council of India – Respondent
ORDER :
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 29.01.2022 to grant a certified copy of certificate of practice in the petitioner name bearing AIBE Roll No.:63213261 as per the due process of law within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and pass such further other order as this Hon'ble Court deem fit.
When the matter was listed for hearing on 11.06.2024, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In order to give opportunity to the petitioner, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list this matter under the caption “For Dismissal” on 13.06.2024.
2. Even today i.e., on 13.06.2024, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. Thus, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition in W.P.No.2758 of 2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear and show interest in the proceedings.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear in court, demonstrating a lack of interest in the proceedings.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner shows a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear and show interest in the proceedings.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to show interest in pursuing the case.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear and show interest in the case.
A writ petition becomes infructuous when the circumstances that necessitated the petition no longer exist, such as the retirement of the respondent.
The Bar Council is mandated to investigate complaints against advocates and enforce prohibitory orders to maintain the integrity of the legal profession.
The court affirmed the right of a petitioner to seek a revision under Section 48A of The Advocates Act when a complaint is dropped by the Bar Council, emphasizing adherence to due process.
The court reaffirmed that statutory remedies provided under the Advocates Act must be exhausted before seeking judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
