IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
S. Jayalakshmi – Respondent
W.A. No. 1862 of 2021, C.M.P. No. 11859 of 2021
Decided On : 18-06-2024
Writ Appeal - Selection Process - Writ Petition 18023 of 2019 - The court upheld the Teachers Recruitment Board's decision regarding non-selection due to failure to meet eligibility criteria under the PSTM quota, emphasizing the importance of compliance with application requirements.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent participated in a selection process for the post of P.G. Assistant (Economics) but was not considered under the PSTM quota due to incorrect information on her application and failure to produce required certificates during verification.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Teachers Recruitment Board acted correctly in not selecting the respondent as she did not meet the eligibility criteria, and the writ court's previous orders did not guarantee her selection.
Issues: Whether the respondent was eligible for selection under the PSTM quota and if the Teachers Recruitment Board's decision was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent's failure to provide necessary documentation and her incorrect application details precluded her from being considered for the PSTM quota, affirming the Board's decision.
Result: The order in W.P. No. 18023 of 2019 is set aside; the Writ Appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 18.02.2021 passed in W.P. No. 18023 of 2019.
1. The intra-court appeal on hand has been instituted questioning the validity of the writ order dated 18.02.2021 passed in W.P. No. 18023 of 2019.
2. The respondents in the writ petition is the appellants before us. The respondent participated in the process of Selection for appointment to the post of P.G. Assistant (Economics) in Education Department. The selection was of the year 2012-13 notified by the Teachers' Recruitment Board. The respondent states that she had submitted an application to avail the benefit under PSTM quota. However, her case was not considered under PSTM quota. Thus, she filed W.P. No. 31294 of 2013 and the writ petition was allowed by this Court on 29.08.2017 and a direction was issued to the respondents therein, to include the name of the petitioner in the provisional list for certification verification for the post of P.G. Assistant (Economics). After certificate verification, if she is found to be eligible for appointment, the respondent authorities are directed to select and appoint the petitioner to the post of P.G. Assistant (Economics) on merits and in accordance with law.
3. Therefore, in the original writ petitions the High Court has not issued any positive direction to appoint the respondent. The direction was issued to conduct certificate verification and if she is found to be eligible for selection, then her case should be considered for selection and appointment. Therefore, the order is to conduct certificate verification and find out whether the respondent was eligible for selection and appointment or not.
4. The said writ order was taken by way of writ appeal in W.A. No. 611 of 2019. The writ appeal filed by the Teachers Recruitment Board and Directorate of School Education was dismissed as infructuous taking into account the subsequent events. The Division Bench of this Court disposed of the writ petition an infructuous mainly on the ground that the Teachers Recruitment Board called the respondent for Certificate Verification. Further, the writ court held that if the respondent is found eligible, then alone she must be selected. Thus, the Division Bench found that no further consideration is required in the writ appeal, since the process of certificate verification was completed as per the directions issued by the writ court. Thereafter, the respondent herein filed a contempt petition, which was also closed. The Teachers Recruitment Board passed an order in proceedings dated 04.01.2019 assigning reasons for non-selection of the respondent.
5. Challenging the said order, the respondent herein filed W.P. No. 18023 of 2019 and the said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with Rules/Regulations/Guidelines. The impugned order in the writ petition in W.P. No. 18023 of 2019 would reveal that the petitioner belongs to Backward Class community. The petitioner has not secured eligible cut-off marks as applicable to Backward Class community. She was originally not called for certificate verification. Pursuant to the order passed in W.P. No. 31294 of 2013, she was called for certificate verification under the category of persons under Tamil Medium quota for the subject Economics. The respondent produced the certificates and the Teachers Recruitment Board found that the petitioner has shaded in her application form (OMR sheet) the medium as “English.” On the date of certificate verification, the respondent did not produced certificate of having studied M.A. (Economics) in Tamil Medium issued by the competent Authority.
6. Two aspects considered by the Teachers Recruitment Board would reveal that the respondent has shaded in her application form (OMR sheet) the medium as “English”. Therefore, she is not eligible to avail the benefit under the Tamil Medium quota. Secondly, during ce
Eligibility for selection must be strictly determined by compliance with application requirements and relevant quotas.
The implementation of legal provisions, such as judgments and government orders, should be prospective and not retrospective to avoid unsettling settled issues.
The court held that the Directorate of Government Examinations cannot issue PSTM Certificates since it does not conduct relevant courses, emphasizing respect for existing judicial decisions.
Candidates must have studied in Tamil medium throughout their education to qualify for PSTM reservation, regardless of the medium of instruction for their diploma.
Candidates completing higher secondary education in Tamil medium through private study are eligible under the PSTM category, supported by valid certification.
Eligibility for PSTM category requires entire education in Tamil medium; no PSTM certificate for diploma needed if degree is the qualification.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.