SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4613

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, A.D.MARIA CLETE, JJ.
C.Selvakumar - Appellant 
Versus 
The State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent 
W.A.(MD) Nos.84, 325, 457 & 1093 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.468, 2558, 2559 & 9828 of 2019
Decided on : 05-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.Suresh
For the Respondents: Mr.J.Ashok, Mr.T.Amjad Khan

The court held that the Directorate of Government Examinations cannot issue PSTM Certificates since it does not conduct relevant courses, emphasizing respect for existing judicial decisions.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Educational Rules - Issuance of Persons Studied in Tamil Medium (PSTM) Certificate - Appellants challenged denial of PSTM Certificate by the Directorate of Government Examinations, which claimed no practice of issuing such certificates as they do not run courses. Court upheld the prior decision of the Division Bench (dated 16.03.2020), stating the appellants had applied with full knowledge of certification requirements. (Paras 2, 4, 7, 9)

(B) Judicial Authority - Court does not interfere in matters already settled by a higher authority unless compelling reasons are presented. Court found no justification to revisit the grounds raised by the appellants. (Paras 9)

Facts of the case:
Appellants were denied PSTM Certificates after applying for them, resulting in a challenge against the dismissal of their writ petitions.

Findings of Court:
The claim for PSTM Certificate was dismissed as the Directorate neither conducts courses nor issues such certificates.

Issues: Main issues were related to the right to PSTM Certificate issuance and acknowledgment of application knowledge.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed that existing rulings regarding educational qualifications must be respected, emphasizing no new rights can be claimed based on prior ignorance of application criteria.

Result: Writ appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appellants contest rejection of pstm applications. - What are the implications of the absence of PSTM certificates for the appellants? (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on entitlement for pstm certificate rejected. - What are the implications of the absence of PSTM certificates for the appellants? (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. directorate's lack of authority for issuing pstm. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. court defers to prior ruling on this issue. - What reasons did the court provide for dismissing the appeals? (Para 9)
5. appeals dismissed without further consideration. - What reasons did the court provide for dismissing the appeals? (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

The present intra-court appeals have been instituted challenging the writ orders dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants.

2. The grievance of the appellants is that Persons Studied in Tamil Medium (PSTM) Certificate has not been issued by the Directorate of Government Examinations for undergoing the certificate course, which resulted in denial of opportunity to the appellants, who participated in the recruitment process under the quota allotted for the persons studied in Tamil medium.

3. The respective learned counsels appearing for the appellants would mainly contend that the candidates, who undergone the course, are entitled for the certificate stating as to whether they had undergone the course in Tamil medium or in any other medium. When the appellants made applications seeking PSTM Certificate, their applications were not considered and came to be rejected by the respondents. Thus, the appellants filed the writ petitions. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned orders, dismissed the writ petitions. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants have preferred the present writ appeals.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Teachers Recruitment Board would oppose the contentions of the appellants by stating that the issue on hand is no more res integra. The Division Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court has already elaborately considered the issue on hand and delivered a judgment dated 16.03.2020 in W.A.Nos.404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 412 and 413 of 2020 ( The Secretary, Department of School Education and others vs. R.Vijayalakshmi ) and therefore, the present writ appeals deserve to be dismissed.

5. Learned counsels appearing for the respective appellants relied on the interim direction issued by this Court in the present writ appeals directing the respondent – Department to furnish the particulars relating to issuance of PSTM Certificates and the reason for rejection of the appellants' applications.

6. In this context, the Director of Government Examinations filed an affidavit, dated Nil, September, 2024. The said affidavit reveals that the Directorate of Government Examinations conducted examinations for the individual private candidates only and do not run any institutions or conduct any training or coaching classes for the candidates, who applied for lower or higher grade examination. The primary function of the Directorate is only to conduct examinations. Hence, questioning the verification done for such institutions whether they are imparting such courses only in Tamil language does not arise. In the said affidavit, the Director of Government Examinations has further stated that the candidates, who possess the educational qualification as prescribed, alone are eligible to apply for lower and higher grade technical examinations. The relevant portion of the said affidavit reads as under:

“LOWER GRADE

Candidates who apply for LOWER GRADE should have passed 8th standard (ESLC) or Equivalent Examinations in a recognized school or appeared as private candidate with English as one among the Subjects as per Tamilnadu Educational Rules.

HIGHER GRADE

Candidates who apply for HIGHER GRADE should have passed 10th standard (SSLC) or Equivalent Examinations in a recognized school or appeared as private candidate as per Tamilnadu Educational Rules.

(Or)

Candid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top