SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1817

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. SUNDAR, K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, JJ.
O.P. Arumugam, S/o. Palani - Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Collector Office Salem District & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 13756 of 2024
Decided On : 14-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Muthusamy.
For the Respondents:Mr. T.K. Saravanan Government Advocate, Mr. V. Nanmaran Additional Government Pleader.

IMPORTANT POINT
The establishment of a monitoring framework for addressing land encroachment claims, ensuring due process and the preservation of rights for all parties involved.

Headnote:

ENCROACHMENT - LAND DISPUTE - The court addressed a writ petition concerning alleged encroachment on government land, emphasizing the need for a structured monitoring approach as per G.O.(Ms)No.64. The court directed the Divisional Monitoring Committee to investigate the claims of encroachment while ensuring due process for all parties involved, preserving the rights of alleged encroachers and allowing them to present their case before any action is taken.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitioner alleged encroachment on government land at Survey No.170 in Sankagiri Village, Salem District, by individuals not party to the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee established under G.O.(Ms)No.64 for investigation into the alleged encroachment, ensuring that all parties, including alleged encroachers, are given an opportunity to present their case.

Issues: Whether there is encroachment on the government land and how to address the claims while ensuring due process for all parties involved.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of a structured monitoring system for government lands and the necessity of preserving the rights of alleged encroachers, directing the Divisional Monitoring Committee to conduct a fair investigation.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine the encroachment claims and report back, with no order as to costs.

ORDER :

M. Sundar, J.

This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Mr. P. Muthusamy, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before us.

3. Adverting to a representation from the writ petitioner dated 23.01.2024, learned counsel submitted that there is alleged encroachment in 'land at Survey No.170 and its Sub-Divisions of Sankagiri Village and Taluk, Salem District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by some individuals, who have not been made parties to this writ petition.

4. Considering the obtaining position, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to (official) respondents and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers.

5. Issue notice to respondents.

6. Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. Mr. V. Nanmaran, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for R4.

7. In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, main WP was taken up.

8. It was submitted by learned Government Advocate that G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.

9. In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Sankagiri, Salem, in the light of G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022.

10. This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land. The Divisional Monitoring Committee shall also ensure that adequate and ample opportunity is given to persons concerned more particularly alleged encroachers before taking a call. In this regard, we are acutely conscious that alleged encroachers are not before this Court and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammeled by this proceedings in this Court.

11. The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022, shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment for further action (for removal of encroachment which again shall be after giving adequate and ample opportunity to alleged encroachers).

12. It is open to the WP petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there are any change of circumstances.

13. We make it clear that we are not expressing any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter.

15. Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top