SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2117

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S.RAMESH, A.D.MARIA CLETE, JJ.
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
C.Kuttithai – Respondent
W.A.(MD)No.2468 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD)No.17267 of 2024
Decided on : 03-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam
For the Respondent: Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar for M/s.Ajmal Associates

Candidates with consistent Tamil medium education, including private study, are eligible under the PSTM category if supported by valid certification.

Headnote:(A) Government Order G.O.(Ms).No.82, Human Resources Management (S) Department dated 16.08.2021 - Eligibility under PSTM category - The court upheld the eligibility of candidates who completed their education in Tamil medium, including those who studied privately, provided they have certification confirming Tamil medium instruction. (Paras 2, 11, 12, 13)

(B) Writ Appeal - The court affirmed the decision of the learned Single Judge allowing the respondent to participate in the selection process under the PSTM category, emphasizing the importance of the certificate issued by the Joint Director confirming Tamil medium education. (Paras 3, 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The respondent was permitted to participate in the selection process under the PSTM category despite completing the 10th standard privately, as he had consistent Tamil medium education and a valid certificate confirming this.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the respondent met the eligibility criteria for the PSTM category based on the certificate issued by the Joint Director, which was not disputed by the appellant.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent's private study for the 10th standard disqualified him from the PSTM category.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the broader interpretation of eligibility under the PSTM category should be applied, focusing on the overall Tamil medium instruction rather than solely on the mode of study for the 10th standard.

Result: Writ Appeal disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT :

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.S.RAMESH, J.]

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order in W.P.(MD)No.11316 of 2024, dated 18.06.2024 and allow the present Writ Appeal.

Challenge is made to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.06.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.11316 of 2024.

2. In the order passed in the Writ Petition dated 18.06.2024, the respondent/candidate was permitted to participate in the further course of selection by treating her under PSTM category. In the said order of the learned Single Judge, the Government order in G.O.(Ms).No.82, Human Resources Management (S) Department dated 16.08.2021, was read down and the candidates who had completed their 12th examination privately in Tamil medium were recognized to be eligible under PSTM category. After passing of the order in the writ petition, the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Vs. C.Dineshkumar in W.A.(MD)No.2164 of 2024 dated 29.10.2024, had an occasion to deal with a similar issue and had recognized the status of the students who had completed the higher secondary education in Tamil medium through private study, to be eligible under PSTM category. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:

    “11. The primodial contention of the appellant revolves around the eligibility of the respondent under the PSTM (Persons Studied in Tamil Medium) category, as defined in Notification No. 03/2022, dated 23.02.2022. The appellant-department argues that since the respondent completed his 10th standard privately, he does not meet the criteria for the PSTM category. However, the materials show that the respondent completed his education from 1st to 9th standards in Tamil medium at a regular school, and while he studied privately for the 10th standard, he took the exam in Tamil medium. He subsequently completed his higher secondary education (11th and 12th standards) in Tamil medium at a regular school and also completed his undergraduate degree in Tamil medium. The overall circumstances of his education demonstrate consistent Tamil medium instruction, which aligns with the intent of the PSTM quota. The writ court rightly recognized this broader interpretation of eligibility, focusing on the fact that the respondent wrote his 10th standard examination in Tamil medium.

    12. The appellant department's action of withholding the respondent’s candidature is based on the argument that private study for the 10th standard disqualifies him from the PSTM category. However, the Government Order G.O.(Ms) No. 82, dated 16.08.2021, protects candidates who have studied in Tamil medium, even if certain exams were completed privately, provided there is certification from the relevant authority confirming the use of Tamil medium. In this case, the respondent obtained a certificate from the Joint Director, Directorate of Government Examinations, Chennai, dated 09.03.2022, which confirmed that the respondent took his 10th standard exam in Tamil medium, fulfilling the essential requirement for consideration under the PSTM category. The certificate issued by a competent authority is valid and stands as adequate proof of the respondent’s eligibility.

    13. In the present case, the certificate issued by the Joint Director itself is explanatory which clearly proves that the respondent has passed the higher secondary examination through medium of instruction in tamil. The said certificate has not been disputed by the appellant herein and therefore, the contention of the appellant that the respondent studied in tamil medium privately is unsustainable on the simple ground that the educational authorities themselves issued the said certificate. Eventhough the appellant has strongly contended that the respondent has not studied his higher secondary examination in tamil medium, they have not produced any material to prove that the respondent has studied in medium of instruction other than tamil mediu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top