Back
G. K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
S. Vasanthi – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar, Madurai – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the refusal check slip issued by the second respondent vide Refusal Number RFL/Melur (West)/34/2024, dated 4.12.2024 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the second respondent to register the sale deed presented before him in respect of the property in S. No. 38/4, 38/5, 38/10 and 39/5 situated in Ettimangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order, dated 4.120.2024, passed by the second respondent, thereby, refused to register the sale deed, which was presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of the subject property.
2. Mr. M. Sarangan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The Petitioner had purchased the aforementioned property by way of registered sale deed vide document No. 2027/1954, dated 2.8.1954 & Doc. No. 1140/1968, dated 230.5.1968 registered in the second respondent o
The court established that the right to register a property sale deed cannot be denied based on the absence of original documents when certified copies are provided, reaffirming the principles of pro....
Non-production of original documents cannot justify refusal to register a settlement deed when certified copies are available, affirming the constitutional right to property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and not supported by law, allowing registration based on certified copies.
The court ruled that a Sub Registrar cannot refuse registration solely due to non-production of original documents, emphasizing the constitutional right to deal with property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to property, as it is not supported by the Registration Act.
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on non-production of original documents is arbitrary and not supported by law, affirming the right to deal with property.
Immovable property transfer does not mandate original parent document production for registration, especially in familial contexts, aligning with principles of reasonable rights to property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary, lacking statutory support, and the rights of property owners must be protected.
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on the absence of original documents is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to deal with property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
