BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
S. Vasanthi – Petitioner
Versus
The District Registrar, Madurai – Respondent
W.P. (MD) No. 30380 of 2024, W.M.P. (MD) No. 25551 of 2024
Decided On : 07-12-2024
ORDER :
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the refusal check slip issued by the second respondent vide Refusal Number RFL/Melur (West)/34/2024, dated 4.12.2024 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the second respondent to register the sale deed presented before him in respect of the property in S. No. 38/4, 38/5, 38/10 and 39/5 situated in Ettimangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order, dated 4.120.2024, passed by the second respondent, thereby, refused to register the sale deed, which was presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of the subject property.
2. Mr. M. Sarangan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The Petitioner had purchased the aforementioned property by way of registered sale deed vide document No. 2027/1954, dated 2.8.1954 & Doc. No. 1140/1968, dated 230.5.1968 registered in the second respondent office. From the date of purchase, the Petitioner’s mother was in possession and enjoyment of the above said properties till her lifetime and after the demise of her mother, the Petitioner’s brother Dharmaraj also passed away on 3.10.2021 as a bachelor. The Petitioner’s father and another brother Mainvasagam also passed away. Therefore the above said properties came to the possession of the Petitioner and patta has also been issued to him vide patta No. 3574. Further original sale deed in favour of his mother is also found missing. Hence the Petitioner decided to register the present sale deed without the original deed before the second respondent on 4.12.2024 in TP/202505098/2024.Since the same was refused to be registered for want of original document, the Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition for the aforesaid relief.
4. This issue has already been dealt with by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court recently in W.A. No. 1160 of 2024 by judgment dated 27.09.2024. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted hereunder:
8. The fundamental principle of law relating to transfer of immovable property is caveat emptor. A buyer of the property is required to be careful in not purchasing certain properties which are already encumbered or from person who does not have title. Even if a person sells a property
The court established that the right to register a property sale deed cannot be denied based on the absence of original documents when certified copies are provided, reaffirming the principles of pro....
Non-production of original documents cannot justify refusal to register a settlement deed when certified copies are available, affirming the constitutional right to property.
Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration citing prior sale agreement; requires original or non-traceable certificate under S.34-C.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and not supported by law, allowing registration based on certified copies.
The court ruled that a Sub Registrar cannot refuse registration solely due to non-production of original documents, emphasizing the constitutional right to deal with property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to property, as it is not supported by the Registration Act.
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on non-production of original documents is arbitrary and not supported by law, affirming the right to deal with property.
Immovable property transfer does not mandate original parent document production for registration, especially in familial contexts, aligning with principles of reasonable rights to property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary, lacking statutory support, and the rights of property owners must be protected.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.