Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
T. Visalakshi – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar (Administration), Office of the District Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner executed sale deed (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's view on registration rules (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. insistence on original documents (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. writ petition allowed (Para 10) |
ORDER :
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned Refusal Check Slip issued by the second respondent in No.RFL/Vadipatti/2/2025 dated 07.01.2025 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently directing the second respondent to register the Sale Deed presented by the petitioner and the release the same within the time stipulated by this Court.
3. The petitioner became the absolute owner of the subject property and the revenue records were mutated into the petitioner's name and patta was also granted vide Patta Nos.1136 and 1038. The petitioner along with her daughters and son jointly executed a sale deed in favour of one B.Rengasamy for valid consideration and executed sale deed on 16.12.2024 and presented the same for registration. However, the second respondent refused to register the same on the ground that the petitioner has not enclosed the original documents in respect of the subject property.
5. In the case of Federal Bank v. Sub-Registrar reporte
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on the absence of original documents is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to deal with property.
The court ruled that registration of a sale deed cannot be denied based on non-production of original documents when certified copies are available, emphasizing the constitutional right to deal with ....
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to property, as it is not supported by the Registration Act.
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on non-production of the original parent document is arbitrary and violates the constitutional right to deal with property.
The court ruled that the refusal to register a sale deed based on non-production of original documents is arbitrary and not supported by law, affirming the right to deal with property.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and not supported by law, allowing registration based on certified copies.
The court ruled that the insistence on original documents for property registration is arbitrary and unsupported by law, affirming the right to deal with property as a constitutional right.
The non-production of an original parent document cannot be insisted upon when certified copies are available for verification in property registration processes.
The refusal of registration of a sale deed solely on the ground of non-production of the original document is arbitrary and violates the principles of property transfer rights.
The registrar cannot refuse to register a property deed solely due to non-production of the original document when certified copies are provided and verifiable.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
