SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, V.SIVAGNANAM, JJ.
P.Ananda Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Director General of Police (Prison) – Respondent
W.P.No.28839 of 2024
Decided on : 15-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Kasirajan
For the Respondent: Mr.E.Raj Thilak, Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, Mr.R.Krishna Kumar

The court mandated the improvement of communication facilities for legal practitioners with undertrial prisoners, emphasizing adherence to the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules and the protection of prisoners' rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 - Writ of Mandamus filed to ensure facilities for unconvicted criminal and civil prisoners regarding interviews and letters - Court emphasized the need for compliance with Rule 541, ensuring reasonable facilities for communication with legal advisers - Recent Supreme Court judgment highlighted the rights of prisoners and the necessity for proper facilities - Court directed the Prison Authorities to implement necessary changes to facilitate communication effectively. (Paras 6, 10, 12, 14)

(B) Legal practitioners must be treated with dignity and mutual respect between legal practitioners and Prison Authorities is essential for addressing prisoners' grievances. (Paras 15, 16)

ORDER :

[Order of the Court is made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, direction based on the petitioner representation dated 21.09.2024.

The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 21.09.2024.

2. The petitioner is a practising Advocate in the Madras High Court and District Courts. The writ petition was instituted to ensure the facilities to be granted to the unconvicted criminal prisoners and civil prisoners in the matter of interviews and letters.

3. Beyond that it is brought to the notice of this Court that the Prison Authorities have made certain arrangements and improved the facilities pursuant to the meeting with the official of the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai held on 25.07.2023 at 05:00 P.M. at the Conference Meeting Hall, High Court Heritage Building, Madras.

4. Pursuant to the minutes, certain facilities inside the prison are also provided by the Prison Department. However, frequent complaints have been received by the Courts that the legal practitioners are not permitted to communicate with the undertrial prisoners as per the procedures contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983.

5. In this context, it is relevant to consider Rule 541 of the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983, which reads as under;

    “541. Facilities to be granted to unconvicted criminal prisoners and civil prisoners in the matter of interviews and letters.— (1) Unconvicted criminal prisoners and civil prisoners shall be granted all reasonable facilities at proper times and under proper restrictions for interviewing or otherwise communicating either orally or in writing, with their relatives, friends, and legal advisers.

    [Provided that in respect of accused or under-trial prisoners under the Terrorists and Distruptive (Prevention) Activities Act, 1987 (Central Act 28 of 1987) the relatives and friends, who desire to interview them, shall produce a certificate from the concerned village Administrative Officer or Member of Legislative Assembly of the constituency concerned as to the residence and relationship to such accused or under-trial prisoners.]

    (2) Every interview between an unconvicted prisoner and his legal adviser shall take place within sight, but out of hearing of a prison official. A similar concession shall be allowed by the Superintendent in the case of an interview with any near relative of the unconvicted prisoner.

    (3) When any person desires an interview with an unconvicted criminal prisoner in the capacity of the prisoner's legal adviser, he shall apply in writing, giving his name and address and stating to what branch of the legal profession he belongs and he must satisfy the Superintendent that he is the bona fide legal adviser of the prisoners with whom he seeks an interview and that he has legitimate business with him.

    (4) Any bona fide confidential written communication prepared by an unconvicted criminal prisoner as instructions to his legal adviser may be delivered personally to such legal advisor or to his authorised nominee without being previously examined by the Superintendent. For the purpose of this rule, the term, 'legal adviser' means a legal practitioner within the meaning of Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 (Central Act XVIII of 1879).

    (5) Civil prisoners may see their friends, relations and legal advisers at such time and under such restrictions as the Superintendent may appoint and the presence of a prison officer shall not be necessary. No Visitor shall be allowed to take within the prison any sweet meats or other eatables without the express permission of the Superintendent.”

6. It is needless to state that an undertrial prisoner cannot be compared with the convicted prisoner. Therefore, the Prison Manual contemplates separate facilities to be granted to unconvicted prisoners and civil prisoners. Reasonable facilities as contemplated under the Prison Manu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top