SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1861

M. S. RAMESH, C. KUMARAPPAN
Ezhumalai – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kadaladi Police Station – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for Mr.Agilesh Kumar.S.
For the Respondent: Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and sentence dated 28.09.2018 imposed in S.C.No.12 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai.

The instant Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused 1 to 4, 8 and 9 against the order of conviction passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai in SC.No.12 of 2009 vide order dated 28.09.2018. There were originally 13 accused, out of whom, the 7th accused died during pendency of trial. Hence, the charge against him got abated. In respect of the accused 5, 6, 10 to 13, the Trial Court did not find them guilty and acquitted them. Therefore, the accused, who suffered conviction viz., accused 1 to 4, 8 and 9 have preferred the instant Criminal Appeal.

2 (a). According to the prosecution case, there was a long drawn dispute between the accused and the deceased family in respect of a passage, which leads to the village common graveyard. It appears that the accused's family purchased an extent of 1/2 acre from one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top