SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1837

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, G. ARUL MURUGAN, JJ.
G. Kulanchiyappan - Appellant
Versus
The Vice Chancellor, Indian Maritime University and Anr. – Respondents
W.A.Nos.1147 to 1154 of 2017 and C.M.P. Nos. 16060 to 16067 of 2017 and 21452 and 21456 of 2019
Decided On : 29-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vishnu Mohan.
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Sankara Narayanan, Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Srinivasamurthy.

The absence of recruitment rules does not render appointments illegal if a transparent selection process was followed; regularization may be granted based on the nature of service rendered.

Headnote:(A) Indian Maritime University Act, 2008 - Section 49 - Regularization of services - Writ Appeals filed by post-graduate employees seeking regularization of their services in IMU - Court found that initial appointments were regular and necessitated due to absence of recruitment rules until 2015 - Mandamus issued to regularize services within four weeks. (Paras 7, 30, 56)

(B) Employment Law - Regularization - Court distinguished between illegal and irregular appointments, emphasizing that satisfactory service over a decade warrants consideration for regularization despite initial temporary contracts. (Paras 35, 38)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, post-graduates employed in various capacities at IMU, sought regularization of their services after years of satisfactory performance, despite the absence of formal recruitment rules until 2015.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the appellants' appointments were regular and justified, ordering their regularization due to their long service and satisfactory performance.

Issues: The main issues included whether the appellants' appointments were illegal or irregular and the justification for their regularization compared to other employees.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of recruitment rules at the time of appointment does not render the appointments illegal, and the satisfactory service of the appellants warranted regularization.

Result: Writ Appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Anita Sumanth, J.)

(Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against order dated 09.08.2017 in WP.No.19597 of 2017 on the file of this Court.)

This is a batch of 8 Writ Appeals. The appellants/Writ Petitioners are post graduates. Their educational qualifications are tabulated below:

S.No.

W.P.No./W.A.No

Name of the Petitioner

Educational qualification

1

19597 of 2017

1147 of 2017

G.Kulanchiyappan

Post Graduate in Commerce and Master of Library and Information Science

2

19598 of 2017

1148 of 2017

R.Padma

Post Graduate in MBA (Human Resource Management), M.A. (Public Administration), B.Sc., (Botany)

3

19599 of 2017

1149 of 2017

P.Navaneethakrishnan

Post Graduate in M.Tech (VLSI) MBA (International Business), B.E.(ECE)

4

19600 of 2017

1150 of 2017

Srinivasa Rao Manukonda

Post Graduate in Computer Application, B.Sc. (Mathematics)

5

19601 of 2017

1151 of 2017

M.Premavathi

Post Graduate in MBA (HRM), B.Com

6

19602 of 2017

1152 of 2017

V.Senthil Kumar

B.Sc.(Physics), M.A.(Public Administration), MBA (HR)

7

19603 of 2017

1153 of 2017

P.Rajalakshmi

M.Tech.(VLSI), B.E.(ECE)

8

19604 of 2017

1154 of 2017

R.Rachel Mary

Post Graduate MBA (Master of Administration), B.Com

2. The Indian Maritime University (IMU) was constituted under the Indian Maritime University Act, 2008 (in short ‘Act’) on 14.11.2008. The Act integrated several Universities that existed at a national level for promotion of maritime studies and research and other connected matters.

3. Section 49 of the Act provides for transfer of assets of the Training Ship Chanakay, Mumbai, the Marine Engineering and Research Institute, Mumbai, the Marine Engineering and Research Institute, Kolkata, Lal Bahadur Shastri College of Advance Maritime Studies, Mumbai, the National Maritime Academy, Chennai, Indian Institute of Port Management, Kolkata and the National Ship Design and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam into the IMU.

4. The employees of the aforesaid Universities stood transferred to the IMU and were extended options as below:

    (i) the employees of the four training institutes under Indian Institute of Maritime Studies who shall stand transferred to Indian Maritime University shall have the option to continue on deemed deputation in Indian Maritime University on the terms and conditions in force of the Central Government and also continue to retain or to be allotted government residential accommodation on turn and avail of the Central Government Health Scheme facilities till their retirement;

    (ii) the employees of the National Maritime Academy, Chennai, Indian Institute of Port Management, Kolkata and the National Ship Design and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam shall have the option to continue on the terms and conditions of their respective institutes till their retirement; and

    (iii) all employees shall have the option to join University as per the service conditions of the University.

5. The case of G.Kulanchiyappan, appellant in W.A.No.1147 of 2017 stands on a different position qua the other 7 appellants as Mr.Kulanchiyappan was an employee in the National Maritime Academy (NMA), Chennai and exercised the option to continue with the IMU post its constitution. The services of Kulanchiyappan as a clerk in the NMA had been extended to the IMU as well.

6. There is no defence put forth to his Writ Appeal, being W.A.No.1147 of 2017 and the respondents would accede to the prayer in Writ Petition, being W.P.No.19597 of 2017, for a mandamus seeking regularization of his services.

7. In light of their accession to the prayer, W.A.No.1147 of 2017 is allowed and mandamus as sought for in W.P.No.19597 of 2017 is issued to the respondents to regularize his services as against the existing vacancy within a period of four (4) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. IMU was up in 2008 and with that, came the necessity to populate the University with necessary

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top