SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2084

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Krishnakumar, ACJ., P.B.Balaji, J.
A.Lloyd Ponnudurai - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Law Department and ors. – Respondents
W.P.No.26484 of 2024
Decided On : 09-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms.Srika Selvam
For the Respondent: A.Edwin Prabakar, State Government Pleader, Mr.R.Srinivas, Senior Counsel

Judicial restraint is essential in administrative decisions unless proven mala fide or unreasonable; delay in filing petitions can be fatal to claims.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition seeking quashment of G.O. (Ms.) No.264, Law (LS) Department, dated 14.09.2018, regarding the shifting of Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College - The court emphasized the need for judicial restraint in administrative decisions unless mala fides or prejudice is shown - The petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal mala fides or unreasonable action by the government. (Paras 9, 11, 12, 15)

(B) Delay and Laches - The court noted that the petitioner challenged the government order after a significant delay of six years, which is fatal to the case, as it encourages stale claims and undermines the rights of third parties. (Paras 13, 14)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed to quash a government order that shifted Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College from Chennai to two new campuses, citing the need for space for the High Court. The petitioner argued that this decision eroded the college's heritage and caused undue hardship to students.

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petition, emphasizing the government's need for space and the lack of evidence of mala fides or unreasonable action.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the government order and the impact of the college's relocation on students.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that judicial intervention in administrative decisions should be limited, and the petitioner failed to prove any malice or unreasonable action by the government.

Result: Writ petition dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.

ORDER :

D.Krishnakumar, ACJ.

Seeking a primary relief of quashment of G.O. (Ms.) No.264, Law (LS) Department, dated 14.9.2018, issued by the first respondent, the present writ petition is filed, wherein the incidental relief sought is to direct the official respondents to handover the heritage building, including the land to “Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College”, the erstwhile “'Madras Law College”, and declare the same as a “Centre for Advanced/Post Graduate Legal Studies and Research”.

2.1. The brief résumé of the facts, as have been exposited in the writ petition, run thus: In the academic year 2018-2019, Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College, [the erstwhile “Madras Law College”], located adjacent to the campus housing the magnificent edifice of the High Court of Madras, was bifurcated and shifted to the backwoods, to wit, (i) to Pattarai Perumpudur in Thiruvallur District, which is 65 km away from the old campus, to conduct the Three-year Law Course and L.L.M. Courses; and (ii) to Pudupakkam in Chengalpattu District, which is 40 km away from the old campus, to conduct Five-Year Law Course. The above bifurcation and shifting of the Law College from Chennai to the newly constructed campuses, referred supra, was ordered vide G.O.(Ms.) No.188, Law (LS) Department, dated 28.06.2018, based on the recommendation made by the Justice P.Shanmugam Commission of Inquiry.

2.2. Accentuating the need for ameliorating the infrastructural facilities in the High Court, with specific reference to the inadequacy of Court Halls and Chambers to accommodate the Hon'ble Judges of High Court; shortage of space for the Registry and the staff members, besides space for maintaining and preserving the records; and the space crunch faced by the Bar Associations etc., the Registrar General of the Madras High Court, had requested the government, vide letter dated 06.09.2018 to handover the land and heritage building, wherein the Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College was earlier functioning, to the High Court of Madras.

2.3. The Government, vide G.O.(Ms) No.264, Law (LS) Department, dated 14.09.2018, has accepted the aforesaid request made by the Registrar General and directed the Director of Legal Studies to handover the land and buildings, including the heritage building of Dr.Ambedkar Government Law College, to the High Court of Madras.

3.1. The main plank of the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the act of government per se eroding the educational heritage and identity of the prestigious institution and thereby depriving the generations from being educated in the iconic inspiring institution, is a historic blunder. The shifting of the college from smack dab in the middle of the city to the backwoods, has immensely and intensely affected the education, health and life aspirations of the students. Further, the students have to expend a significant amount on travel expenses everyday, as there are no adequate transport facilities. There are no shops, proper canteen facilities or medical facilities within the proximity of the said campuses and the students must travel about 3 km to access basic amenities. The hostelers are frequently affected by the skin diseases caused by 'Paederus beetles' and such beetles are large in number in the hostel premises.

3.2. The next submission put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the report of the Justice Shanmugam Commission of Inquiry has recommended conversion of the High Court Law College Campus into a Post Graduate Study Centre in Law and a training centre for legal education, so that the services of expert lawyers of the High Court in various specialized branches of law can be best utilized. However, without paying heed to the said recommendation, the government order, impugned in this writ petition, has been passed and, therefore, the same has to be set aside.

3.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has produced the government order in G.O. (Ms.) No.294, Home (Courts-III) D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top