SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Subramanian, R.Sakthivel, JJ.
Anandan (Deceased) and ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India Rep. By Secretary to Government (Revenue Department) and ors. – Respondents
A.S.NO.566 OF 2018 AND CMP NO.6666 OF 2021
Decided On : 27-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari Senior Counsel, for M/s.B.S.Mitra Neeshan
For the Respondent: Mr.P.S.Kothandaraman, Government Pleader (Puducherry)

The court established that the highest market value from comparable sales must be prioritized in compensation assessments for land acquisition, leading to a revised valuation of Rs.250/- per sq.ft.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6, 18, and 54 - Compensation for land acquisition - The Supreme Court remanded the case for reassessment of market value based on sale deeds, emphasizing the need for proper valuation and consideration of relevant documents. The Reference Court's valuation of Rs.100/- per sq.ft. was found unjustifiable, leading to a new valuation of Rs.250/- per sq.ft. (Paras 2, 18, 24, 28)

(B) Evidence - Additional documents - The court dismissed the petition to admit additional documents under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC, stating that the appellants failed to demonstrate their relevance and necessity for adjudication. (Paras 10, 15)

Facts of the case:
The Government of Puducherry acquired land for airport expansion, with the appellants claiming compensation based on higher market values from sale deeds. The L.A.O. initially assessed the value at Rs.60/- per sq.ft. (Paras 4, 6)

Findings of Court:
The court determined the market value of the subject land at Rs.250/- per sq.ft., acknowledging the inadequacy of the previous assessment and the relevance of certain sale deeds. (Paras 27.1, 28)

Issues: The main issues included the admissibility of additional documents and the justification of the market value determined by the L.A.O. (Paras 11, 18)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the highest value among comparable sales should be considered, and the absence of relevant sale deeds undermined the L.A.O.'s assessment. (Paras 18.4, 24)

Result: Appeal partly allowed, with compensation fixed at Rs.250/- per sq.ft. (Para 28)

JUDGMENT

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

Aggrieved with the Judgment dated February 10, 2022, made in A.S.No.566 of 2018 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the appellants and the first respondent - Union of India had preferred Civil Appeal Nos.3899 and 3900 of 2024 respectively before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide its Order dated March 7, 2024 remanded the matter to this Court to redetermine the relevance of the Sale Deeds produced on record for the purpose of assessing the market value of the lands acquired from the appellants herein.

2.It is apposite to extract the relevant Paragraphs of the aforementioned Order dated March 7, 2024 viz., Paragraph Nos.7 to 11 hereunder:

    “7.On consideration of the rival submissions, we deem it appropriate to remand the case to the High Court with a request to redetermine the relevance of the sale deeds produced on record, for the purpose of assessing the market value of the acquired land. All the contentions raised on behalf of the parties before us are left open to be urged before the High Court.

8.The instant appeals are, accordingly, allowed in part and the impugned judgment is set aside. The matter is remanded to the High Court. The parties are directed to appear before the High Court on 10.04.2024.

9.It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

10.It is pointed out at this stage by learned counsel for the land owners that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court has also not been released so far and that the Authorities have deducted the TDS on whatever compensation amount was paid to the land owners earlier.

11.Since the compensation awarded by the Reference Court is not in dispute at all, the Union of India and other official respondents are directed to release the compensation, as awarded by the Reference Court, along with solatium and statutory interest accrued thereupon till date to the land owners without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Since no TDS can be deducted on the compensation paid for compulsory acquisition, the amount deducted towards TDS shall also be released to the land owners without any delay.”

3.Hence, this Court will now be considering the matter afresh.

Facts in Brief :-

4.The Government of Puducherry decided to acquire ‘land measuring an extent of 19.92.70 Hectares in R.S.No. 21, 24, 25, 26, 43, 44 and 46 of Karuvadikuppam Revenue Village, Oulgaret Taluk, Puducherry District’ [‘acquired lands' for short] for the purpose of expansion of Puducherry Airport. The appellants own a ‘land area of 2.39 Hectares (2,57,257.21 sq. ft) in R.S.No. 25/2 of Karuvadikuppam Revenue Village, Puducherry’ [‘subject land’ for short]. Notification was issued under Section 4 (1) of 'the Land Acquisition Act, 1894' ['L.A. Act' for short] with respect to the acquired lands including the subject land and the same was published in the Gazette on June 30, 2006. The declaration under Section 6 of the L.A. Act was made public on April 25, 2007.

4.1.The 'Land Acquisition Officer' [henceforth 'L.A.O.'] assessed the acquired lands on November 28, 2006, and recorded their valuations on December 6, 2006. During the assessment, the L.A.O. reviewed 874 sale instances that took place between July 8, 2005, and July 7, 2006 i.e., the one-year period before the Notification under Section 4(1) of the L.A. Act. Among these sale instances, 78 sale instances were rejected as they involved the sale of land with superstructures. Further, 45 sale instances were excluded because they related to the sale of less than 500 sq.ft., and 576 sale instances were excluded due to their long distance from the acquired lands. Out of the remaining 175 sale instances, the highest sale at Rs.167/- per sq.ft., was rejected as it occurred on February 1, 2006, in anticipation of the acquisition. The next highest sale at Rs.66/-per sq.ft., pertaining t

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top