ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A. Manivannan – Appellant
Versus
Thariq – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2020 made in A.S. No.21 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2019 made in O.S. No.245 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vellore District.
The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.245 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Vellore, has filed this second appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Principal District Court, Vellore, in A.S.No.21 of 2019, dated 30.01.2020.
2. In the suit, the appellant herein is the defendant and the respondent herein is the plaintiff. In the forthcoming paragraphs, the parties will be referred to as per their litigative status in the suit.
3. The plaintiff had filed the suit seeking for a declaration that he is entitled to use the staircase from the first floor to the terrace, morefully, described in the suit 'B' schedule, and he has also sought for a consequential injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the staircase and also terrace and also for a perman
Ram Sarup Gupta Vs. Bishun Narain Inter College and others [1987 (2) SCC 555]
Sree Swayam Prakash Ashramam and another Vs. G.Anandavally Amma and others [2010 (2) SCC 689]
Easementary rights can be implied from circumstances and do not require explicit mention in pleadings, affirming the right to access property above owned land.
Where Easement Act inapplicable, easement rights governed by justice, equity, good conscience; right by gift deed extinguished by changed circumstances providing independent access and causing servie....
Easementary rights must be substantiated by clear evidence of continuous use, and title documents play a crucial role in determining such rights.
Easementary rights must be evidenced by uninterrupted and peaceable enjoyment for twenty years, as per Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, to be enforceable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear title and acceptable evidence to support claims of possession and easementary rights.
The court affirmed the Plaintiffs' easementary rights based on historical use and legal documentation, emphasizing the significance of such rights in property law.
Easement rights conveyed through property transfers can include implied grants, and a defendant cannot restrict access without legal rights to do so.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a proper examination of evidence and claims in cases involving right of way, and the need for the court to consider all relevan....
To establish an easement of necessity, there must be common ownership and impossibility of enjoyment of one tenement without the other; mere lack of alternative access is insufficient.
Implied easement rights for property use transfer automatically, barring explicit contradictory intentions in property deeds.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.