Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. Ramesh, N. Senthilkumar, JJ
Vellingiri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
M.S.RAMESH, J.
The judgment of the Trial Court dated 14.08.2019 passed in S.C.No.55 of 2019 by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, holding the sole accused/appellant guilty of having committed the offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentencing him to life imprisonment together with fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of which, to undergo 3 months simple imprisonment, is under challenge in the present Criminal Appeal.
2. The brief case of the prosecution is that the deceased had married one Kavitha, who is the daughter of the accused. Owing to a matrimonial dispute, on 20.12.2017, the wife of the deceased had left her matrimonial house and went to the house of her father/accused. According to the prosecution, when the deceased had gone to the accused's house to bring back his wife, he was scolded and assaulted by the accused, his wife and sister-in-law. Thereafter, the parents of the deceased had consoled and advised him to wait for 2 days to bring back his wif
The testimony of a sole eye-witness can suffice for conviction if credible and corroborated by medical evidence, even if the extra-judicial confession is weak.
Evidentiary value of eyewitness testimony can support a conviction even if the witness is related to the victim, provided the testimony is credible and corroborated by additional evidence.
Eyewitness testimony can suffice for conviction if credible and corroborated by medical evidence, emphasizing the need for reliability in such cases.
Circumstantial evidence must be established beyond reasonable doubt; absence of eyewitnesses and contradictions in testimonies led to a modification of conviction from murder to culpable homicide not....
A conviction under Section 302 IPC requires reliable evidence beyond hearsay; mere allegations without corroboration are insufficient for a guilty verdict.
The higher evidentiary value of injured eyewitness testimony and the principle that minor contradictions in eyewitness testimonies, which do not go to the root of the matter, cannot be considered mat....
The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC was upheld based on circumstantial evidence demonstrating a complete and unbroken chain leading to the appellant's guilt.
The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(ii) IPC, emphasizing the absence of premeditation and the presence o....
The court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the credibility of eyewitness testimony and scientific evidence linking the accused to the crime.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article