SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2472

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR, JJ.
M.G.Colony Residents Welfare Association (regd No 164/2013) - Appellant 
Versus 
The Government of Tamilnadu - Respondent 
WP No. 4880 of 2024
Decided on : 28-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam
For the Respondent: Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, Mr.D.R.Arunkumar, Mr.M.Fazil Perarivalan

Governmental authorities must comply with planning regulations to ensure the protection of designated open spaces and address unauthorized constructions effectively.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act - Writ of Mandamus - Unauthorized construction in open space by respondents causing inconvenience to residents. Petitioner's representation dated 18.07.2023 not acted upon by authorities, necessitating intervention. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
Court directs authorities to inspect, identify, and demolish unauthorized constructions within twelve weeks. (Paras 6)

Issues: Whether the unauthorized constructions violate planning regulations and the necessary enforcement actions by authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasizes the necessity for governmental compliance with planning laws to protect public interest and restore intended utilization of open spaces.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions for enforcement.

Table of Content
1. unauthorized construction affecting public space. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding enforcement actions by authorities. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court directs inspection and action on unauthorized constructions. (Para 6)

ORDER :

S.M.Subramaniam, J.

The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent to remove the unauthorized construction made in the open space area put up by the 4th and 5th respondents by considering petitioner's representation dated 18.07.2023.

2. The petitioner is M.G.Colony Residents Welfare Association..

3. The grievance of the petitioner / association is that unauthorised constructions are put up in the open space causing inconvenience to the residents of that locality. The residents are unable to utilise the open area for the purpose for which it was kept as open area under the Planning Rules.

4. Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that large scale unauthorised constructions are put up and the Authorities have failed to initiate any action to remove unauthorised construction.

5. Mr.D.R.Arunkumar, the learned Standing Counsel for the Coimbatore Corporation would submit that the Authorities are in the process of verifying the unauthorised construction.

6. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the respondents 1 to 3 are directed to conduct inspection and survey and identify the unauthorised constructions, if any and initiate enforcement actions by following the procedures as contemplated under the statutes and rules in force. The unauthorised constructions so identified, are to be demolished. The said exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top