Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice P.B. Balaji, J
C.Palanisamy, Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies – Respondent
ORDER :
The review application has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking to review my order dated 21.07.2023 in W.P.No.30477 of 2018.
2. I have heard Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel for the review applicant, Mr.B.Tamilnidhi, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2. The third respondent refused to receive notice and the fourth respondent, despite service of notice, has not chosen to appear in person or through a counsel. I have also gone through the records.
3. While disposing of the said writ petition, I had directed the first respondent, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Erode, to proceed with the Section 87 surcharge proceedings, after giving reasonable opportunity to the writ petitioner. I further directed the exercise to be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. I also found that the writ petitioner was not exonerated and the writ petition itself was premature.
4. It is an admitted fact that the writ petitioner filed a Writ Appeal challenging my order dated 21.07.2023. However, the said W.A.No.1676 of 2024 was withdrawn with liberty to prefer a review application before me. Subsequently, the rev
The court held that a review application is not maintainable when the underlying proceedings have already been initiated and concluded, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness in administra....
The court reaffirmed that review applications cannot contest substantive inquiries already concluded without demonstrating evident procedural errors, maintaining that accountability rests with the Se....
The threefold actions of departmental disciplinary proceedings, criminal cases, and surcharge proceedings can be initiated simultaneously, and the time limits prescribed in statutes regarding complia....
The court emphasized that participation in legal proceedings is essential for claiming natural justice, and failure to engage actively negates claims of prejudice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
