SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2758

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
Munirathinam - Appellant 
Versus 
The Secretary to Government - Respondent 
W.P.No.29905 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.29905 of 2024
Decided on : 02-04-2025 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Kamadevan
For the Respondent: Mr.V.Nanmaran, AGP

Age limit for appointment can be relaxed for Scheduled Caste candidates, allowing for a maximum age of 40 years, thus quashing the cancellation of appointment.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - Section 20(8) - Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service - Age limit for appointment - Candidate belonging to Scheduled Caste entitled to an age relaxation of 5 years, making the upper limit for appointment to the post of Cook 40 years - Writ Court quashed the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment based on age - The petitioner sought appointment despite being above the prescribed upper age limit, arguing the applicability of age relaxation. (Paras 4-7)

(B) Public Service Employment - The requirement to be able to read and write Tamil as a qualification for the post of Cook and its implications were discussed. (Paras 6-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a member of the Scheduled Caste, had sought an appointment as Cook but faced cancellation of her appointment due to age over 35 years despite being entitled to age relaxation under the relevant rules.

Findings of Court:
The Writ Court found that the petitioner was entitled to the age relaxation, thus cancelling the prior order of dismissal and directing her appointment reaffirming her eligibility.

Issues: The main issue was whether the age limit for the petitioner could be exceeded based on her Scheduled Caste status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that as per the rules, the petitioner was entitled to an additional age limit due to her background, and hence the cancellation of her appointment was unjustified.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be appointed as Cook.

Table of Content
1. writ petition regarding cancellation of appointment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. previous ruling on age limit and educational qualifications. (Para 3)
3. final order for reinstatement and benefits. (Para 5)
4. age relaxations for scheduled caste/tribe candidates. (Para 6)
5. court's reasoning and application of previous judgments. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records relating to an order of the 3rd respondent dated 26.09.2024 and to quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to pass necessary orders on the representation given by the petitioner on 18.09.2024. The petitioner seeks relaxation of the age of the petitioner to continue in the post of 'Cook'.

2. The petitioner belong to Schedule Caste community. She had completed her 12th standard. She had registered her name in the Employment Exchange. She was then recruited as Cook and appointed in the Government Adi-Dravidar Welfare Residential Middle School, Mannur. Thereafter, the appointment was cancelled, since it is contended that she had crossed the age of 35 years. This Writ Petition has been filed questioning that particular cancellation of the order.

3. The issue is no longer res integra. The Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ appeal in W.A.No.3809 of 2024 and batch, the Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department , Chennai Vs. K.Manonmai, had held as follows:

“2. The State is on appeal against the orders of the writ Court quashing the cancellation of appointment of the respondents in all these Writ Appeals, on the ground that the respondents were over aged on the date of appointment and on the ground that the respondent in W.A.No.3809 of 2024 has produced a false Transfer Certificate.

3. All the respondents were appointed as Cooks in the hostels attached to the Adi-dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department. The appointment orders were issued on 26.02.2021. The orders impugned in the Writ Petitions came to be passed on 19.04.2023. The writ Court had found that the respondents were not over aged, on a reading of Rule 5 of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service read with Section 20(8) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016.

4. It is not in dispute that the posts to which the respondents were appointed are covered by the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service. For the post of -Cook- the educational qualification is that a person should be able to read and write Tamil. Rule 5(1) prescribes an age-limit of 30 years on the date of appointment. Proviso to Rule 5(1) grants an additional 5 years to candidates who belong to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes. Therefore, the upper age limit as per the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service is 35 years. Admittedly, all the respondents were aged above 35 years on the date of their appointments. Therefore, the order impugned came to be passed cancelling their appointments. The writ Court found that proviso to sub-section (8) of Section 20 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 would apply and there would be an extension of another 5 years for the post to which the respondents had been appointed. The first proviso to sub-section (8) of Section 20 reads as follows:-

Provided that, for direct recruitment to a post included in a service for which the minimum qualification required is not higher than the minimum general educational qualification, the age limit prescribed shall be increased by five years in respect of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or in respect of destitute widows of all castes, who do not possess a general educational qualification, which is higher than the minimum general educational qualification;

5. Rule 5(1) of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Service, which deals with -Age- reads as follows:-

(1) Age: Candidates for appointment by direct recruitment to any of the posts other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top