IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
S.P. Selvamani – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. By Its Secretary, Department Of Law – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of Notification No.1 of 2025 dated 24.01.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to issue fresh notification in line with the UGC norms and regulations with Higher Education Department of Tamil Nadu Rules and Regulations.
2. The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Professor (Pre-Law) consequent to notification issued by the 2nd respondent / Teachers Recruitment Board dated 24.01.2025.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste community and therefore, there must be a relaxation in age of five years granted and therefore, contended that the maximum age limit of 40 should be relaxed to 45 years and further, in accordance with the experience, one additional year must be granted. However, in the notification, it is contended that this particular relaxation of additional five years has not been granted to the petitioner, who belongs to the Scheduled Caste community.
4. It is seen from the notification that vertical reservation has been granted and it h
Eligibility criteria for recruitment cannot be altered mid-process, and no age relaxation beyond prescribed limits is permissible without explicit provision.
Eligibility criteria for recruitment, including age limits, cannot be altered mid-process, and horizontal reservation for age relaxation is not permissible under existing rules.
The court upheld the age limit for Assistant Professor positions as per established guidelines, emphasizing adherence to prior judicial directions and preventing arbitrary changes in recruitment crit....
The court upheld the age limit of 40 years for Assistant Professor (Pre-Law) positions, allowing a maximum extension of 5 years for teaching experience, emphasizing adherence to established guideline....
The court upheld the age limit for Assistant Professor positions, emphasizing adherence to established recruitment guidelines and the prohibition against arbitrary changes mid-process.
The court upheld the age limit of 40 years for Assistant Professor positions, emphasizing adherence to established guidelines to prevent arbitrariness and ensure equality in public employment.
A recruitment notification's eligibility criteria must align with established regulations, and any restrictions not prescribed by the UGC guidelines are impermissible.
The court upheld the validity of the age limit and subject-specific qualifications for Assistant Professor positions, emphasizing adherence to UGC guidelines as a binding standard for recruitment pro....
The court upheld the validity of the age limit and subject-specific qualifications for Assistant Professors, affirming adherence to UGC guidelines and judicial directives.
The TET qualification acquired prior to the recruitment process met the eligibility criteria, and the corrigendum clarified the age relaxation, warranting the consideration of the petitioner's appoin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.