2025 Supreme(Mad) 2760
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR, JJ.
L.Muruganantham, S/o. R. Lingasamy (late) - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent
WP No. 4818 of 2025
Decided on : 02-04-2025
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Town and Country Planning
Act Referred
Headnote
(B) Appeal under Section 79 - Appeal not entertainable to regularize unauthorized construction already made; only Lock and Seal Notice can prompt a revision under Section 80-A. (Paras 4 to 6)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to demolish unauthorized constructions that deviated from the approved building plan granted on 31.03.2011 and complained of inaction by governmental respondents regarding the unauthorized construction by respondents 8 and 9.
Findings of Court:
The 6th respondent confirmed unauthorized construction, and enforcement actions must continue; demolition to occur in May 2025 to consider the education of students.
Issues: The key issue was whether an appeal under Section 79 could be entertained to regularize unauthorized construction that had already occurred.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while unauthorized constructions were identified, the appeal process was not appropriate for regularization; rather, enforcement action is crucial to uphold planning laws.
Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for demolition.
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.L.Muruganantham (P-in-P)
For the Respondent: Mrs.E.Ranganayaki, Mr.P.Srinivas, Mr.S.Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel For Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, Mr.K.Selvaraj
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandatory action for unauthorized construction (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. inspection findings on unauthorized construction (Para 3) |
| 3. section 79 appeal not maintainable for existing violations (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. enforcement actions necessary despite educational concerns (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. demolition timing considerate of academic schedules (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
S.M.Subramaniam, J.
The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 to initiate appropriate action to demolish the unauthorized construction in T.S. Nos.21/1A and 21/1B1 of Ward 7 Block 7 of Dharapuram Town in Tiruppur District and restore the building to the original approved plan within a stipulated time.
2. The petitioner states that building plan approval was granted on 31.03.2011, for construction of a building in S.F.No.372/2A, 373/1A belonging to T.S.No.21/1A, 20/19B of Dharapuram Municipality. The respondents No.8 and 9 constructed buildings unauthorizedly in violation of the building plan permission and deviated the approved plan. Thus, the petitioner made a complaint for initiation of action and to demolish the unauthorized th constructions. The 8 respondent who constructed building unauthorizedly, filed W.P.No.12952 of 2015 seeking a direction to dispose of the Statutory Appeal filed under Section 80 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act and the Division Bench passed final orders on 28.04.2015 to dispose of the revision filed by the 8th respondent. The Government disposed of the appeal vide letter dated 15.07.2015, however, since then, there was no enforcement action initiated under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act nor Lock and Seal Notice was issued against which, the Statutory Appeal is entertainable.
3. With reference to the allegations of unauthorized construction made against the respondents No.8 and 9, the 6th respondent, Assistant Director, District Town and Country Planning Office filed a counter affidavit stating that th the unauthorized constructions are identified. The 8 respondent submitted an application through single window portal application on 27.02.2025 requesting for revised approval for existing school building. During the course of inspection, the authorities found that there is deviation in set back parameters and class rooms size. Thus, the application was returned and refused on 07.03.2025.
4. This Court is of the considered opinion that appeal against Section 79 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act is not maintainable to issue a revised plan in respect of an unauthorized construction already made. Section 79 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, appeal is entertainable, if any person aggrieved by any decision or order of a planning authority under Section 49 or Sub-section (1) of Section 54 of the Act may appeal to an authority as prescribed.
5. Holistic reading of Section 79 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act in entirety would amplify that the appeal is relatable to an application submitted seeking building plan permission under Section 49 of the Act, or sub-Section (1) to Section 54 which enumerates that “if it appears to an appropriate planning authority that it is expedient, having regard to the development plan prepared, that permission for any development granted under this Act or any other law, should be revoked or modified, the said planning authority may, after giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard against such revocation or modification, by order, revoke or modify the permission to such an extent as may be necessary”.
6. Therefore, an appeal under Section 79 of the Act is not entertainable to regularize the unauthorized construction already made by seeking a revised plan approval or modification of the building plan permission already granted based on which, the constructions were made already. Only in the event of issuing a Lock and Seal Notice, a revision alone would lie before the Government u