Back
V. M. VELUMANI, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
D. Madhusudhanan – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 3rd Respondent its Officers, employees or anybody claiming under or through it from proceeding further in pursuance of the impugned notice in Letter No.13/0003/2021, dated 29.07.2022 and seeking the petitioner''s building should not be demolished or removed or interfered until the disposal of petitioner''s special revision application filed under Section 80(A) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 before the 1st Respondent.)
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition forbearing the 3rd respondent, its officers, employees or anybody claiming under or through it from proceeding further in pursuance of the impugned notice in Letter No.13/0003/2021, dated 29.07.2022 and seeking his building should not be demolished or removed or interfered until the disposal of his special revision application filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 before the 1st respondent.
2. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Governm
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for expeditious disposal of revision applications under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the res....
Expeditious disposal of appeals under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the restraint of coercive steps against the petitioner.
The need for expeditious disposal of statutory appeals and the restraint on coercive steps by respondents pending disposal of the appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to direct the petitioner to rectify the defects within a specified time frame and permit the respondents to take appropriate ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of planning authorities to process pending applications under Section 113C and refrain from coercive action until the disposal of ....
Court grants final opportunity to vacate unauthorized building before sealing enforcement.
The court emphasized the importance of timely consideration of applications under Section 49 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act and the need for fair hearings for all concerned parties.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the pending appeal and maintaining status quo until a decision is made.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
