SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Janaki – Appellant
Versus
Kanagaraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D. Baskar
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Suresh Babu.

ORDER :

(SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.)

This Criminal Revision Case had been filed to set aside the Order dated 13.10.2021 passed in M.C.No.57 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuddalore.

2. The brief facts, which are necessary for disposal of this Criminal Revision Case, are as follows:-

2.1. The marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent was solemnised at TVMS Thirumana Mahal, Cuddalore on 06.04.2011. The Petitioner studied only upto 6th Standard and she lost her father at young age. Therefore, it is stated that she was brought up by her mother and her elder brother. Similarly, the Respondent studied upto 8th Standard. At the time of the marriage, the Respondent's family represented that they had 10 acres of agricultural land and two brick built houses. It was also stated that the Respondent was the owner of TATA ACE load vehicle and earning more than Rs.20,000/- per month. According to the Petitioner, the Respondent's family demanded dowry of 50 sovereigns of gold to the Petitioner, 10 sovereigns of gold to the Respondent, household articles worth Rs.5 lakhs and Rs.2 lakhs for purchase of two wheeler. Even though the mother of the Petitioner and her br

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top