Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice J. NISHA BANU, R. SAKTHIVEL
K. Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Tamizh Elakkiya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of marriage, initial living conditions, and issues (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. claims of financial contributions and allegations of divorce causes (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. trial court's dismissal rationale (Para 12 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. arguments presented by both parties (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's final ruling (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
J. NISHA BANU, J.
Both these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been directed against the Common fair and decreetal order dated 15.03.2022 passed in O.P.Nos.307 and 308 of 2020.
2. The learned Judge, Family Court, Perambalur, dismissed the Original Petition filed by the appellant/husband, which was filed for dissolution of the marriage under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 and allowed the Original petition filed by the respondent/wife seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955.
3. The case of the appellant/husband is that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 01.06.2014. He is working as a doctor in Government hospital at Cuddalore. As a result of the wedlock, a girl child named Darshini was born on 27.06.2015. At the time of marriage, the re
The court affirmed that without established evidence of cruelty, a decree of divorce cannot be granted, highlighting the necessity of proving such allegations for marital dissolution.
Long separation and failure to perform marital duties can constitute grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Normal marital disagreements and the presence of in-laws do not constitute mental cruelty sufficient for divorce. The petitioner did not provide adequate evidence to support claims.
Divorce – Although irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a separately enumerated ground under the Act, prolonged separation of over 14 years between parties is a significant factor that cannot b....
The court held that a counterclaim must be treated independently and allegations of cruelty require clear evidence to warrant a divorce.
The court affirmed that without proven cruelty or desertion, a divorce application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act is likely to be rejected in favor of restitution of conjugal rights under....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the concept of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a weighty circumstance necessitating the severance of marital ties.
Divorce – Cruelty by husband – Compelling wife to discontinue her studies or creating such an atmosphere that she is put in a position not to continue her studies is equivalent to destroy her dreams ....
Restitution of conjugal rights – Filing application for restitution of conjugal rights subsequent to filing of application for dissolution of marriage does not percolate a negative concept.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
