Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.B. Balaji, J
Pinnath Thevar – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni. – Respondent
ORDER :
(P.B. BALAJI, J.)
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.17766/2017/D4 dated 03.12.2020.
2. I have heard Mr.R.Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs.S.Jeyapriya, learned Government Advocate, for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.Tha.Kanagamuthu, learned counsel for the third respondent.
3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the property comprised in survey Nos.1541, 1542 and 1543/2 measuring total extent of 2 Hectares 9 Ares situated in Andipatty Bit II Village, Andipatty Taluk, Theni District. According to the petitioner, the properties were purchased by the petitioner's grandfather, viz., Pinnath Thevar, in the year 1959. He was also issued Nos.2347 and 2043, recognizing his right in the year 1961. After the demise of the grand father of the petitioner, patta was transferred in the name of the petitioner's father, viz., Pavanath Thevar in patta No.1818 and after the demise of the petitioner's father, patta was mutated in the name of the petitioner in patta No.5974. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has obtained electricity connection and also mortgaged t
The court upheld the classification of certain lands as panchamar while rejecting claims over another land not classified as such, emphasizing the need for proof of possession and historical ownershi....
The court held that reclassification of lands negates claims of violation of alienation conditions, and allegations of forgery cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
