Back
K. SARATH
Adusumalli Rajani Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar, Paloncha – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ petition is filed with the following relief:
2. Heard Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, learned Counsel. Appearing for the petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignments.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of different extents of land, total to an extent of Ac.17.02 Guntas situated in Sy. No. 817/34 to 817/40 of Palvancha Village, having purchased the
Point of Law : If land assigned to landless poor persons under Laoni Rules, there must be condition of non-alienation as per settled law, otherwise it cannot be declared as void transaction.
The court held that reclassification of lands negates claims of violation of alienation conditions, and allegations of forgery cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
