Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.Murali Shankar, J
Sellasamy Pandian @ Selvakumar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep.by The Inspector Of Police – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2085 of 2024, dated 28.11.2024 on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Sivagiri, Tenkasi District, dismissing the petition filed under Section 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the property and buildings situated in S.No.620/1 and 619/27, which admeasures 45 cents in Sivagiri Village (part-II) Tenkasi District, originally belonged to the petitioner's grandmother Kulanthai Rani @ Sivagnana Natchiar; that the petitioner's grandmother died intestate on 10.11.1977 and her grandfather Ponnusamy Pandian also died intestate on 25.06.1991; that patta for the said property in dispute stands in the name of the petitioner's grandfather in patta No. 3311; that after the death of the petitioner's grandparents, the property came to be owned by their legal heirs/petitioner's mother Vijayarani @ Palanimuthu Veerammal Natchiar, Gomathi Gurumuthu Natchiar @ Kalaivani, P.M.M.M.I.Pandian, P.M.V.S.V.Pandian, P.Venkatesan and Snehavalli Muthu Meenatchi @ Devi; that the petitioner's mother died on 03.07.2020 leaving behind three sons, three daughters incl
The court affirmed that criminal proceedings should not be used to resolve civil disputes, emphasizing the discretion of the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to dismiss petitions lacking merit....
The court ruled that a Magistrate can dismiss a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. if the dispute is civil in nature, emphasizing that civil matters should not be pursued through criminal channels....
The court affirmed that a Magistrate has discretion under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to determine if a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, and dismissal of such petitions is valid if the dispute is....
The court ruled that civil disputes regarding property do not constitute cognizable offences for criminal investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. when they are barred under the Code and pertain to....
The dismissal of a petition for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is justified when no cognizable offence is disclosed, aligning with the procedural requirements of Sections 195 and 340 Cr.P....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle that the continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of process of the Court, especially in the presence of pending....
The court affirmed that civil disputes cannot be converted into criminal cases for quicker relief, emphasizing the need for careful judicial discretion under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
